04 December 2021: Articles
Avatrombopag Effectively Maintained Platelet Counts in a Patient with Immune Thrombocytopenia Who Was Intolerant to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatmentHillary S. Maitland A*
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e933788
BACKGROUND: First-line treatments for patients with immune thrombocytopenia include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-D. These may be followed by second- and third-line options, including thrombopoietin receptor agonists and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib. These treatments have different mechanisms and divergent adverse event profiles. We show that fostamatinib-associated adverse events can be mitigated with fostamatinib dose reduction and the introduction of avatrombopag, and that response can be maintained with avatrombopag monotherapy.
CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old woman with a history of chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenia since 2006 had previously received steroids, rituximab, splenectomy, and eltrombopag without achieving platelet count stability. The patient reported flu-like symptoms in February 2020, with platelet counts ranging from 25×10⁹/L to 50×10⁹/L and isolated occurrences <10×10⁹/L. Platelet counts did not respond to eltrombopag 75 mg/day, 2 courses of rituximab, or multiple courses of prednisone. Within 2 weeks of starting fostamatinib 150 mg twice daily, she reached a platelet count of 523×10⁹/L. She experienced new-onset diarrhea associated with fostamatinib, so the dose was reduced to 75 mg twice daily, and avatrombopag 20 mg/day was added to augment platelet recovery. Platelet levels remained in the supratherapeutic range. She was transitioned to avatrombopag 40 mg/day monotherapy and then 20 mg/day owing to continued supratherapeutic platelet counts.
CONCLUSIONS: Avatrombopag can be used in combination with fostamatinib to augment platelet response and reduce the severity of adverse events associated with fostamatinib, while maintaining adequate therapeutic response in chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Avatrombopag 40 mg/day monotherapy was quite effective in achieving and maintaining high platelet counts.
Keywords: Fostamatinib, Platelet Count, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Receptors, Thrombopoietin
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder in which patients experience thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100×109/L) . Treatment is aimed at achieving a safe platelet count (>20–30×109/L) to prevent episodes of severe bleeding . Guideline-recommended first-line therapy for ITP is corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobin, anti-D, or a combination of 2 to 3 of these drugs . Patients who are relapsed or refractory to corticosteroids have several second-line or later treatment options. Those supported by robust clinical evidence include thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs), rituximab, fostamatinib, and splenectomy [2,3]. These treatments act via a variety of mechanisms. Generally, TPORAs act by stimulating platelet cell production, and rituximab, fostamatinib, and splenectomy act by reducing immune cell destruction of platelet cells. More specifically, TPO-RAs bind to the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor and stimulate megakaryocyte progenitor proliferation and increased platelet production [4–6]. TPO-RAs that are indicated for use in ITP in the United States and Europe include avatrombopag and eltrombopag, which are orally formulated, and romiplostim, which is injectable [7–12]. Although not approved for the treatment of ITP, rituximab is sometimes used as an off-label treatment in these patients. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, depresses B-cell counts and may also modify T-cell activity [13–15]. For rituximab responders, treatment results in a significant rise in platelet counts . However, a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial demonstrated that overall and complete response rates were similar in adult patients with ITP who were treated with rituximab or placebo . Fostamatinib acts through yet another mechanism by inhibiting spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) and thus blocking Syk signaling-mediated platelet destruction in patients with ITP, resulting in increased platelet counts in responders . Splenectomy is also an option; because the spleen is the primary site of platelet clearance and autoantibody production, spleen removal results in durable platelet response . However, recent treatment guidelines recommend that splenectomy be reserved for patients who have failed medical therapies .
Adverse events play a role in treatment decisions; agents with different mechanisms have different safety profiles. With TPORAs, there is a potential for increased risk of thrombosis (approximately 6–7%) [7,9,11,19]. The B-cell-depleting effects of rituximab can result in increased risk of hypogammaglobulinemia and infectious complications . Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated adverse events can occur with the Syk inhibitor fostamatinib and include diarrhea and hypertension in about one-third of treated patients . Nausea, dizziness, and liver enzyme increase are also relatively common (> 10% of treated patients) .
Combination therapy in patients with ITP provides a potential opportunity to improve efficacy by targeting different mechanisms of disease pathology and to reduce adverse events. For example, some small studies have reported some benefits to TPO-RA combined with steroids as first-line  and later-line [22,23] treatment for patients with ITP. Additionally, studies have shown that switching to another TPO-RA if the first TPO-RA fails results in a high number of patients who are able to maintain or achieve response with the new treatment . Fostamatinib and avatrombopag are the 2 most recently approved agents for the treatment of ITP (April 2018 and June 2019, respectively) [25,26].
This case study reviews the treatment of a 61-year-old woman who had a history of chronic refractory ITP and who had previously received steroids, rituximab, splenectomy, and eltrombopag, all of which failed to result in a stable platelet count. Although treatment with fostamatinib resulted in stable platelet counts, a combination of low-dose fostamatinib and avatrombopag was initiated to alleviate treatment-associated diarrhea while maintaining a stable platelet count. The outcome of this combination therapy is described here.
This was a 61-year-old woman who was diagnosed with ITP in 2006. Her past medical history included Meniere disease and an undefined connective tissue disorder; past surgeries included tonsillectomy, appendectomy, lysis of adhesions, carpal tunnel release, and splenectomy with subsequent drainage of abscess. The patient did not smoke cigarettes and drank about 1 alcoholic beverage per week.
The patient presented on February 18, 2020, with a platelet count of 18×109/L, which was a reduction compared with her previous visit (166×109/L, January 14, 2020). She had been receiving tapering doses of oral eltrombopag; at the time of the visit, her dose was 25 mg/day, which was increased to 50 mg/day because of the low platelet count. She responded to treatment with an increased platelet count of 117×109/L (March 3, 2020); however, on March 17, 2020, it had decreased to 14×109/L despite the higher dose of eltrombopag. She was switched from eltrombopag to oral fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily and had a good initial response, but, after about 2 weeks, her platelet counts dropped significantly (10×109/L). The dose of fostamatinib was increased to 150 mg twice daily, but the patient continued to experience bruising and she started herself on prednisone. Her platelet count was 25×109/L on April 14, 2020, and she was switched from fostamatinib to eltrombopag (75 mg/day). The patient was seen again on May 4, 2020, reporting she had presented to the Emergency Department over the weekend (May 2, 2020) with a platelet count of 1×109/L. The patient was started on intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2) the following day, and on May 8, 2020, a spiral computed tomography scan revealed no accessory or regenerative splenic tissue. Rituximab treatment resulted in improved platelet counts; however, on June 9, 2020, her platelet count dropped to 7×109/L after being 107×109/L the week prior. At this visit, the patient restarted eltrombopag at 50 mg/day; this was titrated up to 75 mg/day 1 week later owing to an inadequate platelet response. On July 7, 2020, the patient was being treated with eltrombopag at 75 mg/day and her platelet count was stable at 44×109/L. The patient was seen at the University of Virginia for a second opinion on September 1, 2020, and reported that she had been having very little response on eltrombopag 75 mg/day and that she had switched to fostamatinib 2 weeks prior (150 mg orally twice daily); her platelet count was 523×109/L, and it was recommended that she continue on fostamatinib.
Her platelet count trended down through the end of September 2020, at which point she was started on eltrombopag 75 mg/ day in addition to the fostamatinib 150 mg twice daily, and on October 1, 2020, her platelet count had increased to 342×109/L. The eltrombopag was then changed to avatrombopag 20 mg/ day owing to liver function test abnormalities, and the avatrombopag was subsequently discontinued because of persistently high platelet counts. While on fostamatinib alone (150 mg twice daily), the patient’s platelet counts began to slowly drift downward, and her count was 73×109/L on December 29, 2020. At this time, the patient reported having some difficulty with diarrhea, a known toxicity of fostamatinib. On January 2, 2021, she restarted avatrombopag 20 mg every other day and decreased fostamatinib to 100 mg twice daily; platelets increased to 147×109/L on January 4, 2021. Due to continued difficulty with diarrhea, her dose of fostamatinib was reduced to 75 mg twice daily to help reduce the associated diarrhea, and avatrombopag was increased from 20 mg every other day to 20 mg/day to maintain platelet counts. On February 2, 2021, the patient was doing well with the combination; her diarrhea had improved and her platelet count was 395×109/L. The patient was seen again on March 2, 2021, and reported that she was having increasing difficulty with diarrhea related to fostamatinib. Her platelet count was quite high at 617×109/L. Given the supratherapeutic platelet count and the difficulty with fostamatinib-associated diarrhea, fostamatinib treatment was discontinued, and the patient was switched to avatrombopag monotherapy with the dose increased to 40 mg/day. The platelet count was 534×109/L on March 30, 2021, so the avatrombopag dose was decreased to 20 mg/day. The platelet counts and dosing for fostamatinib and avatrombopag over time are shown in Figure 1.
This case study demonstrates that TPO-RAs can be used in combination with other classes of drugs to alleviate adverse events by allowing for a dose reduction while still maintaining a safe platelet count. TPO-RAs have a unique mechanism of action relative to other agents used to treat ITP and in theory may provide synergistic effects in combination with other therapies, particularly in patients who are resistant or refractory to treatment. There are few reports of TPO-RA combination therapy for ITP, and these generally report on combinations with steroids. A small study reported that first-line eltrombopag plus high-dose dexamethasone improved response rate in newly diagnosed ITP (vs historical data of dexamethasone monotherapy) . A small study of eltrombopag and high-dose dexamethasone in patients with chronic ITP reported complete response (platelet count ≥100×109/L) in 10 of 11 patients . It has also been reported that a TPO-RA combined with a low steroid dose (2.5–5 mg prednisolone) can benefit patients who were not responding to treatment . A small retrospective study of combination therapy with TPORA (either eltrombopag or romiplostim), immunosuppressants, and intravenous immunoglobin in pediatric or adult patients with ITP reported that 13 of 18 were considered responders with this combination treatment . The present case study is the first report of combination treatment with fostamatinib and a TPO-RA, as fostamatinib is a relatively new agent .
It should be noted that while TPO-RAs are mechanistically similar, they have different pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy profiles; therefore, switching between them because of inconvenience, lack of efficacy, or unacceptable adverse events is a reasonable treatment approach [24,28]. For example, eltrombopag chelates polyvalent cations and should be taken either without a meal or at least 2 h before or 4 h after medications or products that contain polyvalent cations (eg, calcium-rich food, antacids, and mineral supplements) [9,29]. This is not the case for avatrombopag, as it does not have the potential to chelate polyvalent cations [7,29]. Another difference is that, in patients who are treated with eltrombopag, there is a need to monitor liver function, and dose adjustments can be necessary in certain populations (eg, Asian patients and patients with liver impairment) [9,30]. In contrast, clinical trials of avatrombopag have reported only a few incidences, most of which were transient, of increased liver function tests with treatment [30,31]. Regarding efficacy, a recent review of retrospective clinical data for patients who had switched from one TPO-RA to another reported that 78% of patients achieved or maintained a response after switching . In patients who switched due to lack of efficacy, 65% had improved platelet counts after switching . Prior to fostamatinib treatment, the patient in the present case study had been treated with eltrombopag on multiple occasions. Although she would initially respond, she developed liver function abnormalities requiring a change of therapy. Despite this, she had an excellent response to a different TPO-RA, avatrombopag.
Although the diarrhea experienced by the patient was assumed to be caused by fostamatinib, as diarrhea is a known toxicity of the drug , it was not possible to rule out other potential causes for her diarrhea. We note that the patient had been treated with fostamatinib previously and did not experience diarrhea, and the onset of diarrhea was approximately 4.5 months after the initiation of fostamatinib. However, the diarrhea did improve after fostamatinib dose reduction and was completely resolved after discontinuing fostamatinib.
In this first report of combined fostamatinib and avatrombopag for the treatment of a patient with ITP, it was found that the addition of avatrombopag to fostamatinib could allow for a reduction in fostamatinib dose to mitigate adverse events that the patient was experiencing, while augmenting platelet response. The potential benefits of this combination may be due to the different mechanism of action of each drug. The patient ultimately was taken off fostamatinib and it was demonstrated that avatrombopag 40 mg/day monotherapy was quite effective in achieving and maintaining high platelet values. The evidence presented in this case study provides support for further studies of combined fostamatinib and avatrombopag for the treatment of patients with ITP who experience unacceptable adverse events or inadequate efficacy on fostamatinib alone.
1.. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T: Blood, 2009; 113(11); 2386-93
2.. Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB: Blood Adv, 2019; 3(22); 3780-817
3.. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM: Blood Adv, 2019; 3(23); 3829-66
4.. Broudy VC, Lin NL: Cytokine, 2004; 25(2); 52-60
5.. Erickson-Miller CL, Delorme E, Tian SS: Stem Cells, 2009; 27(2); 424-30
6.. Shirley M: Drugs, 2018; 78(11); 1163-68
7.. : DOPTELET (avatrombopag) [prescribing information], 2019, Durham NC, Dova Pharmaceuticals Inc Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/210238s001lbl.pdf
8.. : Doptelet INN (avatrombopag), 2021 Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/doptelet-epar-product-information_en.pdf
9.. : PROMACTA (eltrombopag) [prescribing information], 2018, East Hanover, NJ, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Accessed June 15 2021https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/022291s021lbl.pdf
10.. : Revolade, INN (eltrombopag), 2021 . Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/revolade-epar-product-information_en.pdf
11.. : NPLATE (romiplostim) [prescribing information], 2018, Thousand Oaks, CA, Amgen Inc. Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/125268s163lbl.pdf
12.. : Nplate INN (romiplostim), 2021 Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/nplate-epar-product-information_en.pdf
13.. Stasi R, Pagano A, Stipa E, Amadori S: Blood, 2001; 98(4); 952-57
14.. Stasi R, Cooper N, Del Poeta G: Blood, 2008; 112(4); 1147-50
15.. Audia S, Samson M, Guy J: Blood, 2011; 118(16); 4394-400
16.. Ghanima W, Khelif A, Waage A: Lancet, 2015; 385(9978); 1653-61
17.. Bussel J, Arnold DM, Grossbard E: Am J Hematol, 2018; 93(7); 921-30
18.. Chaturvedi S, Arnold DM, McCrae KR: Blood, 2018; 131(11); 1172-82
19.. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Giagounidis A: Eur J Haematol, 2013; 91(5); 423-36
20.. Lucchini E, Zaja F, Bussel J: Haematologica, 2019; 104(6); 1124-35
21.. Gómez-Almaguer D, Herrera-Rojas MA, Jaime-Pérez JC: Blood, 2014; 123; 3906-8
22.. Magro D, Levato L, Piro E: Haematologica, 2017; 102(s3); 63
23.. Ghanima W, Cooper N, Rodeghiero F: Haematologica, 2019; 104(6); 1112-23
24.. González-Porras JR, Godeau B, Carpenedo M: Ther Adv Hematol, 2019; 10; 2040620719837906
25.. Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-fostamatinib-tablets-itp
26.. Accessed June 15, 2021. Available from: https://dova.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/doptelet-itp-approval-press-release-6-26-19.pdf
27.. Gudbrandsdottir S, Leven E, Imahiyerobo A: Br J Haematol, 2020; 189(2); e37-40
28.. Kuter DJ, Macahilig C, Grotzinger KM: Int J Hematol, 2015; 101; 255-63
29.. Al-Samkari H, Kuter DJ: Ther Adv Hematol, 2019; 10; 2040620719841735
30.. Jurczak W, Chojnowski K, Mayer J: Br J Haematol, 2018; 183(3); 479-90
31.. Bussel JB, Kuter DJ, Aledort LM: Blood, 2014; 123(25); 3887-94
32.. : TAVALISSE (fostamatinib) [prescribing information], 2020, South San Francisco, CA, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Accessed September 24, 2021. Available from: https://tavalisse.com/downloads/pdf/Tavalisse-Full-Prescribing-Information.pdf
19 May 2022 : Case reportBilateral Emphysematous Pyelonephritis Associated with COVID Pneumonia: A Case Report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936370
17 May 2022 : Case reportHigh-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation for Refractory Hypoxemia in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Small Case ...
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936651
13 May 2022 : Case reportA case of exacerbation of haloperidol-induced rhabdomyolysis following the onset of COVID-19
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936589
24 May 2022 : Case reportAdalimumab Mitigates Lumbar Radiculopathy in a Case of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936600
23 May 2022 : Case reportPharmacological and Behavioral Strategies to Improve Vision in Acquired Pendular Nystagmus
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935148
23 May 2022 : Case reportA Case of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Prostate Abscess, Osteomyelitis, and Myositis ...
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936704
Most Viewed Current Articles
23 Feb 2022 : Case reportPenile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of Cocaine
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250
17 Feb 2022 : Case reportMyocarditis, Pulmonary Hemorrhage, and Extensive Myositis with Rhabdomyolysis 12 Days After First Dose of P...
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399
06 Dec 2021 : Case reportLipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406