07 November 2007
The hypoglycemic action of glimepiride in the diabetic liver cirrhosis patients, report of 4 cases
Putut Bayupurnama, Siti NurdjanahCase Rep Clin Pract Rev 2007; 8:266-268 :: ID: 519378
Abstract
Background: Sulfonylurea treatment of diabetic liver cirrhosis (LC) patients is still controversial. The pharmacokinetic of glimepiride does not change in the LC disease. Aim of the study is to report our experience prescribing glimepiride in the diabetic LC patients who had lack of compliance with or refuse insulin treatment.
Case Report: This case study involved four diabetic and ascitic LC patients with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 6.99 mmol/L, with lack of compliance with or refuse insulin treatment, serum creatinine level less than 132.6 μmol/L, and approved glimepiride treatment (started with 1mg/day and then increase to 2 or 3 mg/day if needed ,before meal in the morning). FPG and 2-hour postprandial (2PP) were measured before , periodically,and at the end of treatment. The treatment duration were 24 weeks in one patient and 48 weeks in 3 patients.
In general, the glimepiride lowered the fasting plasma glucose level although it did not show consistent results in all patients. Only one patient showed good control, even asymptomatic hypoglycemia, of FPG level at the end of 48 weeks of treatment. On the other hand, the 2PP level results were inconsistent and the mean value were still high.
Conclusions: Glimepiride treatment lowered fasting plasma glucose level inconsistently and did not show favorable respond to the 2-hour postprandial level in diabetic liver cirrhosis patients. Higher dose of glimepiride may be needed and clinical trial should be performed to confirm the benefit, risk and safety profile of this treatment.
Keywords: Diabetic Diet, Liver Cirrhosis, Insulin Resistance
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
19 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936370
17 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936651
13 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936589
13 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936574
In Press
20 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936826
19 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936252
19 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936318
19 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936377
Most Viewed Current Articles
31 Dec 1969 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250
31 Dec 1969 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399
31 Dec 1969 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
31 Dec 1969 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935355
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935355