05 June 2012: Case Report
Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder
Giulio Baffigo , Giampaolo Delicato , Daniele Bianchi , Stefano Signore , Edoardo Tartaglia , Francesco Corvese , Alessandro Perla , Bonaventura Marino , Giuseppe Santeusanio , Vincenzo Ferdinandi
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.882998
Am J Case Rep 2012; 13:99-101
Background
Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder is a rare uro-oncologic disease with an aggressive behaviour, poorly responsive to radiation or chemotherapy, as first-line treatment [1].
Bladder adenocarcinoma, with or without mucinous differentiation, most often arises at the base or dome, eventually with urachal remnants [2,3]. The classification itself, between primary vesical and urachal, is debated [4].
Case Report
A 62-year-old woman was referred to our urologic unit with a history of chronic urinary retention and urodynamic findings suggesting severe detrusor underactivity, managed by intermittent self-catheterization.
She underwent cystoscopy and voiding cystourethrography, showing no remarkable pathology.
Two years later she came back to our unit for macrohematuria. The external inspection and digital rectal examination showed no remarkable findings, while an accurate examination by vaginal palpation revealed the presence of an irregular, hard swelling lesion of the urethra.
An ultrasound scan showed a neoformation of the bladder neck.
We performed a transurethral resection of a bladder tumor; histological examination demonstrated mucinous adenocarcinoma involving the proximal urethra and the bladder neck with muscle invasion (Figure 1).
Some tumor markers were sampled, with normal values for CEA, Ca 15-3 and Ca 125, while Ca 19-9 greatly exceeded the range (512 U/mL, range 0–37 U/mL).
Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and a colonoscopy excluded any primary disease related to those gastrointestinal tracts.
Staging total body CT scans showed no extravesical spreading, thus, according to the literature [1], and after an oncology consultation, an anterior pelvectomy with extended lymphadenectomy and a Bricker’s ileal conduit urinary diversion was proposed and then performed.
The histological assessment confirmed a mucinous adenocarcinoma (Figure 2) and demonstrated no extravesical or nodal spread.
Grossly, neoplasia appeared as a fungating mass ulcerating the mucosa and invading the bladder wall. The surface of the tumor was covered with gelatinous, slimy, thick material.
Microscopically, we could observe true glandular differentiation with sheets of clear, marked pleomorphism and mitotic activity. There was invasion of the muscle and the glandular component was mucin-secreting, similar to colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Two months after surgery, Ca 19-9 decreased to 32.5 U/mL.
The patient was discharged with a program of periodic oncologic follow-up.
Six months after surgery, she was back to the department because of bilateral inguinal palpable masses.
A bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection was performed, showing a single left 2.3 cm node with metastatic features from mucinous adenocarcinoma.
The patient received adjuvant external radiotherapy by 4500 cGy delivered on the inguinal area over a period of 25 days.
Twenty-eight months after pelvectomy, the patient appears healthy.
Discussion
In the literature, there are cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder metastasizing to the uterus, ovaries, colon and abdominal wall [5,6] and penis [7].
We found 2 reported cases of metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma in 30-year-old women [8,9] and 1 reported case of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bladder (not urachal) in a 25-year-old female patient [4].
On the contrary, there is at least 1 report of a case of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix with bladder metastasis [10].
There are very few reported cases of primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract producing tumor markers [11].
In our experience, the patient had neither organ metastasis nor local spreading of disease at the time of diagnosis, while during the follow-up just 1 inguinal node metastasis was detected. This is likely to be important in successful surgical treatment.
Conclusions
There is no general agreement about the treatment of bladder adenocarcinoma [1,12,11]. Because of its different histological types, early surgical treatment with or without adjuvant radio-chemo-therapy appears to be the best option in cases of small, organ-confined disease [1,13] with mucinous differentiation. In addition, Ca 19-9 proves to be a reliable marker of disease activity in tumors that produce markers.
References:
1.. Palmero Martí JL, Queipo Zaragozá JA, Bonillo García MA, Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder: Actas Urol Esp, 2003; 27(4); 274-80, pmid: 12830548
2.. Sigalas K, Tyritzis SI, Trigka E, A male presenting with a primary mucinous bladder carcinoma: a case report: Cases J, 2010; 3; 49, pmid: 20205820
3.. Mardi K, Gupta N, Urachal papillary cystadenocarcinoma: a rare case report: J Cancer Res Ther, 2011; 7(2); 223-25, pmid: 21768722
4.. Valerio M, Lhermitte B, Bauer J, Jichlinski P, Metastatic primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder in a twenty-five years old woman: Rare Tumors, 2011; 3(1); e9, pmid: 21464882
5.. El-Ghobashy A, Ohadike C, Wilkinson N, Recurrent urachal mucinous adenocarcinoma presenting as bilateral ovarian tumors on cesarean delivery: Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009; 19(9); 1539-41, pmid: 19955933
6.. Jo EJ, Choi CH, Bae DS, Metastatic urachal carcinoma of the ovary: J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2011; 37(12); 1833-37, pmid: 21794003
7.. Neeli S, Prabha V, Alur S, Malur P, Penile metastasis from primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of bladder: Indian J Urol, 2007; 23(3); 314-16, pmid: 19718338
8.. Taylor S, Bacchini P, Bertoni F, An isolated vertebral metastasis of urachal adenocarcinoma: Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004; 128(9); 1043-45, pmid: 15338559
9.. Tazi E, Lalya I, Tazi MF, Treatment of metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma in a young woman: a case report: Cases J, 2009; 2; 9145, pmid: 20062662
10.. Taverna G, Corinti M, Colombo P, Bladder metastases of appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case presentation: BMC Cancer, 2010; 10; 62, pmid: 20178637
11.. Kato M, Onishi T, Hoshina A, Yabana T, Successful treatment with paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract producing carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carbohydrate antigen 125: Urol Int, 2010; 84(1); 116-18, pmid: 20173382
12. Zaghloul MS, Nouh A, Nazmy M, Long-term results of primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: a report on 192 patients: Urol Oncol, 2006; 24(1); 13-20, pmid: 16414487
13.. Cho SY, Moon KC, Park JH, Outcomes of Korean patients with clinically localized urachal or non-urachal adenocarcinoma of the bladder: Urol Oncol, 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






