17 December 2012: Case Report
Double zoonotic peritonitis
Seyed-Ali Sadjadi ABCDEF , Paz Obedoza B , Rommell Devera B
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.883659
Am J Case Rep 2012; 13:279-281
Background
Peritonitis remains a major complication of peritoneal dialysis and the main impediment to its widespread use and a frequent cause of switch to hemodialysis. With implementation of better infection control procedures and new connectology techniques, incidence of peritonitis with common organisms has decreased significantly in the past two decades, but unusual organisms are increasingly being observed and reported. We recently encountered a case of peritonitis caused by two zoonotic organisms. To our knowledge this is the first such case ever reported.
Case Report
The patient was an 83 year old man with history of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease and end stage renal disease, on peritoneal dialysis for two years. He was admitted to the hospital through the emergency room because of abdominal pain. Peritoneal dialysis fluid cell count showed, white blood cell count (WBC) of 437000 per cmm, with >90% neutrophils. He was diagnosed to have peritonitis and he was treated empirically with intermittent intraperitoneal (IP) administration of vancomycin and ceftazidime. Peritoneal fluid culture grew pasturella multocida and antibiotic therapy was changed to oral ciprofloxacin, to which the organism was sensitive. PD fluid cell count continued to decrease and repeat cultures were negative. However, the cell count remained between 100 to 120, with neutrophil count of 20 to 30%. Treatment with ciprofloxacin was continued for three weeks, with the patient feeling better and clinically free from infection. Concluding that peritonitis had been adequately treated, ciprofloxacin was stopped and surveillance continued. One week later, he developed recurrent abdominal pain and PD fluid cell count increased to 1025 cells/cmm, with 78% neutrophils. He was re-treated initially with IP vancomycin and ceftazidime. Fluid culture came back positive for capnocytophaga, but due to evanescence of the organism, it could not be further subtyped. Based on antibiotic sensitivity pattern provided by the microbiology laboratory, he was treated with intraperitoneal Unasyn that was continued for two weeks. While on Unasyn, PD fluid cell count decreased and peritoneal fluid culture was repeatedly negative, but it continued to show a 30 to 40% neutrophil count. Due to refractoriness of peritonitis, the peritoneal dialysis catheter was removed and he was switched to hemodialysis.
Discussion
Our patient had two unusual organisms causing peritonitis:
Peritonitis is not a common complication of capnocytophaga infections. Pers et al. [11] reported the case of 67 year old man who was on automated peritoneal dialysis and developed
It is difficult to distinguish
Due to fastidious nature of the organism, it is difficult to obtain susceptibility testing for antimicrobials but the organism has been reported to be sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, piperacillin, amoxicillin, ofloaxcin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, erythromycin and clindamycin [11,14]. In our patient due to difficulty in growing the organism, no susceptibility testing was done and due to this, he was empirically treated initially with vancomycin and ceftazidime and later with intraperitoneal unasyn(ampicillin/sulbactam). In spite of 3 weeks of treatment, he failed to clear the organisms and due to this the peritoneal dialysis catheter was removed.
Conclusions
We have reported a case of simultaneous pasturella multocida and capnocytophaga peritonitis that was difficult to treat and required removal of the peritoneal dialysis catheter and transfer to hemodialysis. Our patient admitted to having cats that occasionally entered his room and he played with them. Due to this, peritoneal dialysis bags and lines that he had used were inspected and no puncture site was found in either one of them. The patient thought hand contamination with cat saliva may have been the source of his infection. Peritoneal dialysis patients who are cat and dog owners, need to be reminded of the high incidence of pasturella and capnocytophaga carrier rates in these animals and they should be advised not to allow these animals to come in contact with them and their dialysis supplies.
References:
1.. Schiller B, Alcaraz M, Hadley K, Moran J, Peritonitis and zoonosis: Your best friend sometimes isn’t: Perit Dial Int, 2011; 31; 127-30, pmid: 21427243
2.. Chow KM, Pang WF, Szeto CC, Li PKT, Playing cat and mouse with a gram negative organism causing peritonitis: Perit Dial Int, 2010; 30; 663-64, pmid: 21148064
3.. Hamai K, Imai H, Obtani H, Repeated ca associated peritonitis in a patient on automated nocturnal intermittent peritoneal dialysis: Clin Exp Nephrol, 1999; 1; 59-61
4.. Gerardo SH, Citron DM, Claros M: J Clin Microbiol, 2001; 39; 2558-64, pmid: 11427568
5.. Sarma PS, Mohanty S: J Clin Microbiol, 2001; 39(5); 2028-29, pmid: 11326042
6.. Ma A, Goetz MB: Am J Med Sci, 2012 (Epub ahead of print)
7.. Christansen CB, Berg RM, Plosing RR, Moller K, Two cases of infectious purpura fulminans and septic shock caused by capnocytophaga canimorsus transmitted from dogs: Scand J Infect Dis, 2012; 44(8); 635-39, pmid: 22497463
8.. Monrad RN, Hansen DS: Scand J Infect Dis, 2012; 44; 320-24, pmid: 22292539
9.. Lipman L, Tienhoven N, Gaastr W: Tijdschr Diergeneeskd, 2011; 136(7); 490-92, pmid: 21870573
10.. Suzuki M, Kimura M, Imaoka K, Yamada A: Vet Microbiol, 2010; 144(1–2); 172-76, pmid: 20144514
11.. Pers C, Tvedegaard E, Christensen JJ, Bangsborg J: J Clin Microbiol, 2007; 45(11); 3844-46, pmid: 17881542
12.. Chadha V, Waraday BA: Pediatr Nephrol, 1999; 13(8); 646-48, pmid: 10502119
13.. Esteban J, Albalate M, Caramelo C, Reyero A: J Clin Microbiol, 1995; 33(9); 2471-72, pmid: 7494050
14.. , Pathogen safety data sheet-Infectious substances: Public health agency of Canada, 2011; 1-4
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






