25 February 2013: Case Report
A forgotten vascular disease with important clinical implications. Subclavian steal syndrome
Fernando Alcocer ABCDEF , Mariam David ABCDEF , Rachel Goodman ABCDEF , Sachin Kumar Amruthlal Jain ABCDEF , Shukri David ABCDEF
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.883808
Am J Case Rep 2013; 14:58-62
Background
Subclavian Steal Syndrome(SSS) is a fascinating vascular phenomenon in which a steno-occlusive lesion of the proximal subclavian artery causes retrograde flow in the vertebral artery away from the brain stem, subsequently causing vertebrobasilar insufficiency [1,2]. Most commonly this phenomenon presents as an incidental finding. The majority of patients are asymptomatic, however, symptomatic patients typically present with neurological symptoms, such as lightheadedness, hearing loss, or pre-syncope. Atypical presentation of this unique entity represent a challenge for physicians who require a high index of suspicion. We present an atypical presentation case with a review of the most current literature on subclavian steal syndrome diagnostic and treatment options.
Case Report
THE SUBCLAVIAN STEAL SYNDROME REVIEW:
The Subclavian Steal Syndrome is a rare yet well-known phenomenon that presents when a steno-occlusive lesion of the proximal subclavian artery results in the flow reversal of the vertebral artery, giving rise to vertebrobasilar insufficiency [1,2].
It was first described on 1961 by Reivich in the New England Journal of Medicine [1]. He presented a patient with neurological symptomatology and directly attributed to this reversal phenomenon. However, the term “Subclavian Steal” was introduced by Dr. Miller Fisher on an editorial a few months later [2].
The true prevalence of this syndrome is still unknown. It has been estimated by multiple authors from small or single center studies to be between 0.6% and 6% [3,4]. The controversy is generated because up to 80% of patients with flow reversal phenomenon are asymptomatic. Most patients with symptoms will have concurrent cerebrovascular lesions [5].
Subclavian steal symptoms presents secondary to arterial insufficiency, created by a retrograde flow that “steals” blood from the brain circulation, more specifically from the basilar artery via the vertebral artery. Classically it presents with neurological symptoms from the posterior brain and cerebellum [4,6]. Decreased flow over the basilar artery gives rise to symptoms like lightheadedness, ataxia, vertigo, dizziness, confusion, headache, nystagmus, hearing loss, presyncope and syncope, visual disturbances, focal seizures, and in extremely rare cases, death [6–10]. However the vast majority of patients are asymptomatic and rarely require any intervention [3,5,11].
The pathophysiology of SSS involves a proximal subclavian stenosis, which results in a lower pressure in the distal subclavian artery. Because the vertebrobasilar circulation is a closed hydraulic system, this pressure difference creates a retrograde flow, pulling blood from the contralateral vertebral artery to the basilar and then down the ipsilateral vertebral artery, “stealing” from the cerebral circulation [12–14]. This flow reversal has been classified as complete or incomplete meaning the flow reversal is continuous vs. intermittent [14,15]. The latter will reproduce the subclavian steal phenomena, but it is the continuous flow reversal that will be responsible for the majority of the true syndromes [14]. Because the vertebral artery serves as an important collateral circulation to the upper extremity, this same mechanism that may lead to arterial insufficiency and symptomatology from the arm. In such cases, patients may have atypical presentation with weakness of the arm and hand, claudication, cool temperature, and paresthesis [6]. Coronary-Subclavian syndrome is a similar entity that has been described in patients who have undergone CABG with LIMA and a subclavian stenosis reproduce the “steal” syndrome from the coronary arteries via the graft, giving rise to acute coronary symptoms [16–21].
The most common cause of this syndrome is atherosclerosis, which gives rise to stenosis and occlusion in more then 90% of the cases [17,22]. Because the left subclavian artery has a more prominent angle at its origin, turbulent flow will accelerate atherosclerosis and account for more than 80% of the cases. In contrast, there is only a small number of patients that present with right sided symptoms and even fewer with bilateral [3]. Several other etiologies have been described as secondary causes of stenosis, most of them post surgical intervention, post radiation, congenital abnormalities, trauma, arteritis, and even thoracic outlet syndrome [23,24].
Disscusion
Due to the rarity of the subclavian steal syndrome, a high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis. The clinician must perform a detailed history and a careful physical examination looking for common subclavian steal syndrome findings to distinguish from the differential diagnosis that include intracraneal vascular disease, carotid artery disease, vertebral artery disease, brain tumors, and subdural hematomas [3,5,13,15,25]. The subclavian steal syndrome can present with absence or diminished ipsilateral radial pulse, cervical or supra clavicular bruits or thrills, and a presence of a systolic blood pressure difference greater than 20 mmHg between upper extremities [26]. Labropoulos et al. suggest that the later highly correlates with the presence of SSS. They also demonstrated a positive correlation of increasing arm BP differential with occurrence of symptoms [3,27]. Symptoms can be provoked with physical maneuvers that compress the vertebral artery, like rotation of the head towards the opposite side. Raising the patients arms can reproduce the syndrome and lead to a syncopal episode. Exercise can be used to induce neurological symptoms or it can also be performed to detect the disappearance of the radial pulse in the affected side [4].
Confirmation of a steal syndrome is usually made by imaging studies. All imaging tools can be used to detect subclavian stenosis and to observe reversal of flow from the vertebral artery. Carotid duplex ultrasound(US) is the most used and usually the first diagnostic test. US has been used as a screening tool because of accessibility and low cost. It can semi quantify subclavian stenosis and diagnoses other extra-craneal carotid occlusive disease. Occasionally, transcraneal ultrasound is utilized to evaluate the direction of the basilar artery blood flow [3,5]. Recently, higher quality images have been obtained through newer technology modalities such as MRA and have rapidly gained popularity [17,25]. When contrast MRA is not available, CT angiography is another excellent alternative [28]. Conventional cerebral angiography remains the gold standard, for it has the highest sensibility and specificity; However, this method caries the risks of an invasive procedure [10,23,27–31]. Additionally, in patients with CABG and LIMA, stress test with radiocontrast may be helpful to evaluate for coronary-subclavian syndrome [18–21,32].
Invasive treatments for SSS are usually reserved for highly symptomatic patients [11,15,33–35]. Current treatment options include subclavian artery angioplasty and stenting, and surgically bypassing the subclavian artery [10,30–31,36–38]. Stenting the subclavian artery is usually achieved through the femoral artery. It is the preferred method because of lower morbidity, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Retrospective studies suggest PTA with stent have grater than 93% success rate with sustained resolution of symptoms [30]. Inability to cross the occlusion is usually the only cause of failure of this method. DeVries et al concluded that major complications of PTA for SSS, such as stroke and death, can be has high as 3.6%, however surgical correction have a higher surgical risk and a variable success rate, estimated between 73–95% [36,38]. When surgically bypassing the subclavian stenosis, both prosthetic grafts and autogenous veins can be used. Surgically bypassing the subclavian artery restores normal blood flow in the subclavian artery after the point of bypass [34–36]. Axillo-axillary bypass is reserved as an alternative method for high risk surgical patients. Surgical treatment for those patients with coexisting sever carotid stenosis is controversial and carotid endarterectamy is usually perform prior to any intervention for the subclavian artery. Patients who fail intervention and who are not candidates for surgical correction can be treated with antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation. It is also important to emphasize risk factor modification as part of the therapy for secondary prevention. Smoking cessation, life style modification, antiplatelet therapy, blood pressure control, management of hyperlipidema, and diabetes control, all play an essential role in the conservatory management of the subclavian steal syndrome [11].
Conclusions
Patients with subclavian steal syndrome who present with minimal symptomatology or with non life threatening symptoms are recommended to be managed with a conservative approach. Recommendations include antiplatelet therapy, aggressive lipid management, and life style modifications. Management of comorbid conditions as hyperlipidema, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus is also important. This approach targets atherosclerosis and secondary prevention. Our patient presented with advance atherosclerosis disease, multiple lesions including subclavian, renal, and coronary arteries. She was treated with balloon angioplasty and stenting of the right coronary achieving resolution of cardiac symptoms and in a latter time balloon angioplasty and stenting of the right renal artery for kidney preservation blood pressure control. In this case, conservative management required angiographic intervention of other sites.
References:
1.. Reivich M, Holling HE, Roberts B, Toole JF, Reversal of blood flow through the vertebral artery and its effect on cerebral circulation: N Engl J Med, 1961; 265; 878, pmid: 14491362
2.. Fisher CM, A new vascular syndrome: “The subclavian steal”: N Engl J Med, 1961; 265; 912
3.. Labropoulos N, Nandivada P, Bekelis K, Prevalence and Impact of the Subclavian Steal Syndrome: Ann Surg, 2010; 252; 166, pmid: 20531004
4.. Boodth K, Subclavian Steal Syndrome: Tretment with Proximal Vertebral to Common Carotid Artery Transposition: J Neurosurg, 1979; 51(5); 628-40, pmid: 501402
5.. Klingelhöfer J, Conrad B, Benecke R, Frank B, Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of carotid-basilar collateral circulation in subclavian steal: Stroke, 1988; 19; 103
6.. Chan-Tack KM, Subclavian steal syndrome: a rare but important cause of syncope: South Med J, 2001; 94(4); 445-47, pmid: 11332917
7.. Aithal J, Ulrich M, Subclavian Steal Syndrome: N Engl J Med, 2012; 10; 363
8.. Fiels WS, Reflections on “The Subclavian Steal”: Stroke, 1970; 1; 320, pmid: 4942589
9.. Sagkaguchi S, Syncope associated with exercise: Am J Cardiol, 1995; 75; 476, pmid: 7863992
10.. Smith JM, Koury HI, Hafner CD, Welling RE, Subclavian steal syndrome. A review of 59 consecutive cases: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1994; 35; 11
11.. Feringa HH, van Waning VH, Bax JJ, Cardioprotective medication is associated with improved survival in patients with peripheral arterial disease: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47; 1182, pmid: 16545650
12.. Williams CL, Scott SM, Takaro T, Subclavian steal: Circulation, 1936; 28; 14, pmid: 14000834
13.. Lord RS, Adar R, Stein RL, Contribution of the circle of Willis to the subclavian steal syndrome: Circulation, 1969; 40; 871, pmid: 5377222
14.. Berger R, Sidd J, Ramaswamy K, Retrograde Vertebral-Artery Flow Produced by Correction of Subclavian-Steal Syndrome: N Engl J Med, 1967; 277; 64-69, pmid: 5338471
15.. Bornstein NM, Norris JW, Subclavian steal: a harmless haemodynamic phenomenon?: Lancet, 1986; 2; 303, pmid: 2874328
16.. Cheong J, Showkathali R, Partridge W, Severe Coronary Artery Spasm and Subsequent Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: J Cardiovasc Med, 2011; 12; 908-11
17.. Langer DJ, Lefton DR, Ostergren L, Hemispheric revascularization in the setting of carotid occlusion and subclavian steal: a diagnostic and management role for quantitative magnetic resonance angiography?: Neurosurgery, 2006; 58(3); 528-33, pmid: 16528194
18.. Kern KB, Warner NE, Sulek CA, Angina as an indication for non-cardiac surgery: the case of the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome: Anesthesiology, 2000; 92(2); 610-12, pmid: 10691251
19.. Niemiera ML, Haft JI, Goldstein JE, Hobson RW, Retrograde internal mammary artery flow and resistant angina pectoris: Clues to coronary-subclavian steal syndrome: Cath Cardiovasc Diagn, 1986; 12; 93
20.. Kroll CR, Agarwal M, Stouffer GA, Angiographic Evidence of Coronary-Subclavian Steal syndrome: Circulation, 2002; 22; 184
21.. Lelek M, Bochenek T, Drzewiecki J, Trusz-Gluza M, Unstable angina as a result of coronary-subclavian steal syndrome: Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2008; 1; 82, pmid: 20031658
22.. Kestelooth H, Vanhoute O, Reversed circulation through the vertebral artery: Acta Cardiol, 1963; 18; 285, pmid: 14045892
23.. Nguyen NH, Reeves F, Therasse E, Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in coronary-internal thoracic-subclavian steal syndrome: Can J Cardiol, 1997; 13; 285, pmid: 9117917
24.. Lee EB, Seo KK, Acute symptomatic traumatic subclavian steal syndrome: case report: J Trauma, 2003; 55; 370, pmid: 12913652
25.. Van Grimberge F, Dymarkowski S, Budts W, Bogaert J, Role of magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of subclavian steal syndrome: J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000; 12; 339, pmid: 10931598
26.. Conrad M, Toole J, Janeway R, Heamodynamics of the Upper Extremities in Subclavian Steal Syndrome: Circulation, 1965; 346-351, pmid: 5830598
27.. Tan T, Schminke U, Lien L, Tegeler C, Subclavian Steal Syndrome: Can the Blood Pressure Difference Between Arms Predict the Severity of Steal?: J Neuroimaging, 2002; 12(2); 131-35, pmid: 11977907
28.. Park KH, Lee HY, Lim C, Clinical impact of computerised tomographic angiography performed for preoperative evaluation before coronary artery bypass grafting: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010; 37; 1346, pmid: 20138777
29.. Hadjipetrou P, Cox S, Piemonte T, Eisenhauer A, Percutaneous revascularization of atherosclerotic obstruction of aortic arch vessels: J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33; 1238, pmid: 10193722
30.. De Vries JP, Jager LC, Van den Berg JC, Durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for obstructive lesions of proximal subclavian artery: long-term results: J Vasc Surg, 2005; 41; 19, pmid: 15696038
31.. Sixt S, Rastan A, Schwarzwälder U, Results after balloon angioplasty or stenting of atherosclerotic subclavian artery obstruction: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2009; 73; 395, pmid: 19214979
32.. Rossum A, Steel S, Hartshorne M, Evaluation of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome Using Sestamibi Imaging and Duplex Scanning with Observed Vertebral Subclavian Steal: Clin Cardiol, 2000; 23(3); 226-29, pmid: 10761817
33.. Malek A, Higashida R, Phatouros C, Treatment of Posterior Circulation Ischemia with Extracranial Percutaneous Ballon Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Stroke, 1999; 30; 2073, pmid: 10512910
34.. Lum C, Ilsen P, Kawasaki B, Subclavian steal syndrome: Optometry, 2004; 75(3); 147, pmid: 15058696
35.. Salam TA, Lumsden AB, Smith RB, Subclavian artery revascularization: a decade of experience with extrathoracic bypass procedures: J Surg Res, 1994; 56; 387, pmid: 8170136
36.. Wang KQ, Wang ZG, Yang BZ, Long-term results of endovascular therapy for proximal subclavian arterial obstructive lesions: Chin Med J (Engl), 2010; 123; 45, pmid: 20137574
37.. Mahmud E, Cavendish JJ, Salami A, Current treatment of peripheral arterial disease: role of percutaneous interventional therapies: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50; 473, pmid: 17678729
38.. Rigatelli G, Cardaioli P, Giordan M, New Subclavian Artery Angioplasty Technique for Treating Subclavian Coronary Steal Syndrome: Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 84(2); 688, pmid: 17643673
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






