13 May 2013: Articles
Intertrochanteric fracture under an arthrodesed hip
Fayeq M. Darwish AEF , Walid Haddad AEF
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.883909
Am J Case Rep 2013; 14:150-152
Background
Very few cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures below an arthrodesed hip have been reported [1–6], and only 3 of them are intertrochanteric fracture [1–3]. Surgical treatment of these fractures is a real challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Bhandari et al found that intertrochanteric fracture is common and represents half of all hip fractures in elderly people [7]. To relieve pain and avoid the complications of immobility, orthopedic surgeons treat the vast majority of patients with intertrochanteric fracture by open reduction and internal fixation.
The great success of total hip replacement [8] and the numerous disadvantages of hip arthrodesis [9] limited the indications of hip arthrodesis to end-stage arthritis in young patients, where it provides pain relief, allows an active life, and spares the patient the repeated surgeries of total hip replacement [10]. However, it is important to note that the main disadvantages of hip arthrodesis are back pain, scoliosis, knee problems, and lower limb discrepancy.
To the best of our knowledge, the literature reports 3 cases of intertrochanteric fracture under an arthrodesed hip [1–3], 2 of them are patients in their seventies and the third is in his fifties. The surgical treatment offered to them was in the form of double plating [1], gamma nailing, and [3] retrograde intramedullary nailing [2]. Our patient was only 30 years old, so we believe that she is the youngest reported patient with intertrochanteric fracture under an arthrodesed hip. We used a single heavy duty locked plate and cannulated screws to treat her fracture successfully.
Case Report
A 30-year-old female teacher presented to the emergency department in our hospital because she was involved in a motor vehicle collision in which she was the driver. She complained of severe pain in the right hip area and inability to walk. Her past medical history revealed that when she was child she underwent multiple surgeries for treatment of bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip, which resulted in arthrodesis of the right hip On clinical examination the right lower limb was in neutral position (not externally rotated) and longer than the left lower limb, the knee was in 20 degrees of valgus, gluteal muscles were wasted, her lumber spine was scoliotic, and her pelvis was tilted. Plain x-rays showed successful arthrodesis of the right hip joint, very high coxa valga, and a severely displaced intertrochanteric fracture and neglected left hip dislocation (Figure 1). Because of the patient’s characteristics (young female, ambitious teacher, and untreated left DDH), the nature of the fracture (widely displaced, and coxa valga), and after long discussion, we decided that the best treatment was to perform open reduction and internal fixation using a heavy duty locked plate and cannulated screws (Figure 2). Surgery was done through the lateral approach. Postoperatively, she had uneventful course, she started walking on the first postoperative day using crutches, and she was discharged home 1 week after the operation. She was followed up regularly at the clinic, and after 4 months she showed signs of fracture healing.
Discussion
This young female teacher sustained an intertrochanteric fracture under a long-standing solid hip arthrodesis. She was active and contented with her situation until she was injured in the car accident. Long-standing hip arthrodesis is usually associated with atrophy of the muscles around the hip, coxa valga, and abnormal lower limb biomechanics, which are changes that influence choice of surgical treatment of such a fracture. Options for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture include: dynamic hip screw, short intramedullary nail, cannulated screws, AO proximal femoral plate, and sliding plates. The rarity of such fractures and the lack of clinical experience in treating them are reflected in the scant literature on the topic. However, the high neck shaft angle precluded using DHS and any other angled plates, and the displacement and nature of the fracture excluded the use of IMN. Total hip replacement was excluded because the patient was young, there was possibility of atrophied gluteal muscles, and the procedure is technically demanding and has a high rate of failure [11]. Cannulated screws do not offer rigid fixation, so we decided to use a heavy-duty locked plate. Anatomical reduction and severe coxa valga made it easy to apply the plate on the anterior surface of the femur.
Conclusions
Because of the rarity of intertrochanteric fracture under an arthrodesis hip, the proper surgical treatment becomes controversial. Nevertheless, we were fortunate in successfully treating this unusual fracture using a locked plate, an implant that can be useful in treatment of such fractures.
References:
1. Manzotti A, Confalonieri N, Pullen C, Intertrochanteric fracture of an arthrodesed hip: J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007; 89; 390-92, pmid: 17356157
2. Wulke AP, Mader K, Pennig D, Femoral neck fracture in an arthrodesed hip treated by a supracondylar intramedullary locked nail: J Orthop Trauma, 2004; 18; 116-18, pmid: 14743033
3. Ishimaru D, Nozawa S, Maeda M, Shimizu K, Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Ankylosed Hip Joint Treated by a Gamma Nail: A Case Report: Case Rep Orthop, 2012; 2012; 278156, pmid: 23259118
4. Jones LD, Hampton R, Ansari A, A treatment option for femoral neck fractures complicating hip arthrodesis: conversion to a constrained to total hip replacement (case report): Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2007; 17; 203-5
5. Mullaji AB, Todd RC, Late ipsilateral trochanteric fractures in patients with long-standing fusion of the hip: Injury, 1991; 22; 233-35, pmid: 2071211
6. Wong TC, Rikhraj IS, Femoral shaft fracture in a hip arthrodesis: two cases of retrograde interlocking nailing: Singapore Med J, 2004; 45; 85-87, pmid: 14985848
7. Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jönsson A, Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis: J Orthop Trauma, 2009; 23; 460-64, pmid: 19550235
8. Clohisy JC, Curry MC, Fejfar ST, Schoenecker PL, Surgical procedure profile in a comprehensive hip surgery program: Iowa Orthop J, 2006; 26; 63-68, pmid: 16789452
9. Callaghan JJ, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up: J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 1985; 67; 1328-35
10. Beaule PE, Matta JM, Mast JW, Hip arthrodesis: current indications and techniques: J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2002; 10; 249-58, pmid: 15089074
11. Kilgus DJ, Amstutz HC, Wolgin MA, Dorey FJ, Joint replacement for ankylosed hips: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990; 72(1); 45-54, pmid: 2295672
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






