19 December 2013: Articles
Sacrococcygeal chordoma, a rare cause of coccygodynia
Challenging differential diagnosis, Rare disease
Paschalis Gavriilidis ABCDEFG , Dimitrios Kyriakou ABCDEFGDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.889688
Am J Case Rep 2013; 14:548-550
Background
Coccygodynia is defined as pain in and around the coccyx; it is a symptom, not a diagnosis. Its cause remains obscure, apart from the cases caused by local injury; rare causes include chordoma, giant cell tumour, intradural Schwannoma, perineural cyst, and intra-osseous lipoma [1–3].
Chordomas are rare, low-grade, slow-growing but locally aggressive primary bone tumors [4]. The most common location is the sacrococcygeal region (40–50%) and the base of the skull (35–40%), followed by the vertebral bodies (15–20%) [5,6]. Their incidence rate is 0.5 per million [7]. Sacrococcygeal chordomas are insidious tumors that are difficult to diagnose; many patients are treated for an assortment of unrelated diagnoses before the correct diagnosis is made [7].
Case Report
TREATMENT:
The sacrococcygeal sarcoma was excised en bloc with the gluteal musculature, coccyx, and the fifth sacral vertebra. The whole capsule of the tumor was kept intact and at least 2 cm healthy surgical margins were achieved macroscopically. The histopathological report confirmed free surgical margins. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 10th postoperative day. He is scheduled for follow-up visits every 4 months and is doing well 28 months after the intervention.
Although chordoma is resistant to the effects of conventional radiotherapy [6,8], our institution combined the use of post-operative high LET (linear energy transfer) radiation with surgery to attempt to increase disease-free intervals.
Discussion
Surgical resection with wide margins at the initial operation is considered the treatment of choice for sacral chordoma because it improves local control and disease-free survival [9–12].
Local recurrence rates of 43% to 85% and metastases rates of 5% to 40% at 1 to 10 years have been reported for sacral chordomas [10–13]. When gluteal invasion is present, the risk of recurrence is reportedly higher and wider margins are important [14]. To obtain wide margins, a combined anteroposterior approach is usually required for proximal tumors, whereas wide resections of distal sacrum chordomas can be performed through a single posterior approach [5,10,15].
Intraoperative contamination is another major issue in sarcoma surgery [16–18]. One study reported a local recurrence of 28% after en bloc resection of chordoma compared with a 64% local recurrence rate when the tumor spilled intraoperatively [17]. Another study suggested intraoperative contamination of muscle and/or sacroiliac joint increased the probability of local recurrence [16].
Considering the above situation, we conclude that effective management of sacrococcygeal chordoma requires early diagnosis, accurate preoperative staging, definitive and adequate surgical resection with proven tumor-free cut margins, and close follow-up.
Conclusions
The most common underlying cause of coccygodynia and mass formation in the natal cleft is pilonidal disease. The 3 characteristic findings that confirm the diagnosis are: 1) abscess or sinus, 2) drainage of fluid (usually purulent), and 3) midline skin pits. In case one or more of them are absent, we should think about the rare causes of the coccygodynia such as chordoma, giant cell tumour, intradural Schwannoma, perineural cyst, and intra-osseous lipoma [19].
References:
1. Hanelin LG, Sclamberg EL, Bardsley JL, Intra-osseous lipoma of the coccyx: Radiology, 1975; 114; 343-44, pmid: 1111002
2. Kinnet JG, Root L, An obscure cause of Coccygodynia: J Bone Joint Surg, 1979; 61; 299-302, pmid: 422621
3. Ziegler DK, Batnitzky S, Coccygodynia caused by perineural cyst: Neurology, 1984; 34; 829-30, pmid: 6328358
4. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Cancer statistics, 2007: CA Cancer J Clin, 2007; 57; 43-66, pmid: 17237035
5. Dahlin DC, MacCarthy CS, Chordoma: a study of 59 cases: Cancer, 1952; 5; 1170-78, pmid: 12998023
6. Dahlin DC: Bone tumours, 1986; 379-93, Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas
7. Bethke KP, Neifeld JP, Lawrence W, Diagnosis and management of sacrococcygeal chordoma: J Surg Oncol, 1991; 48; 232-38, pmid: 1745047
8. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B: Bone tumours, 1998; 974-10008, St Louis, MO, CV Mosby
9. Ahmed AR, Safety margins in resection of sacral chordoma: analysis of 18 patients: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009; 129; 483-87, pmid: 18568352
10. Atalar H, Selek H, Yildiz Y, Saglik Y, Management of sacrococcygeal chordomas: Int Orthop, 2006; 30; 514-18, pmid: 16552577
11. Barrati D, Gronchi A, Pennacchioli E, Chordoma: natural history and results in 28 patients treated at a single institution: Ann Surg Oncol, 2003; 10; 291-96, pmid: 12679315
12. Bergh P, Kindblom LG, Gunterberg B, Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a study of 39 patients: Cancer, 200; 88; 2122-34
13. Azzareli A, Quagliuolo V, Cerasoli S, Chordoma; natural history and treatment results in 33 cases: J Surg Oncol, 1988; 37; 185-91, pmid: 3352273
14. Yonemoto T, Tazezaki S, Takenouchi T, The surgical management of sacrococcygeal chordoma: Cancer, 1999; 85; 878-83, pmid: 10091765
15. Devin C, Chong PY, Holt GE, Level-adjusted perioperative risk of sacral amputations: J Surg Oncol, 2006; 94; 203-11, pmid: 16900511
16. Hanna SA, Aston WJ, Bringgs TW, Sacral chordoma: can local recurrence after sacrectomy be predicted?: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008; 466; 2217-23, pmid: 18584264
17. Kaiser T, Pritchard D, Unni KK, Clinicopathologic study of sacrococcygeal chordoma: Cancer, 1984; 53; 2574-75, pmid: 6713355
18. Virkus WW, Marshall D, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT, The effect of contaminated surgical margins revisited: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002; 397; 89-94, pmid: 11953600
19. Humphries AE, Duncan JE, Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease: Surg Clin North Am, 2010; 90; 113-24, pmid: 20109636
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






