Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

17 January 2018: Articles  United Kingdom

Complex Reconstruction with Flaps After Abdominoperineal Resection and Groin Dissection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Difficult Case Involving Many Specialities

Unusual setting of medical care

Claudia Reali E 1*, Richard Guy E 2, Christopher R Darby B 3, Lucy Cogswell B 4, Roel Hompes E 1

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.906818

Am J Case Rep 2018; 19:61-67

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal squamous cell carcinoma accounts for about 2–4% of all lower gastrointestinal malignancies, with a distant disease reported in less than 5%. Although surgical treatment is rarely necessary, this often involve large dissections and difficult reconstructive procedures.

CASE REPORT: We present a complex but successful case of double-flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection and groin dissection for anal squamous cell carcinoma (cT3N3M0) with metastatic right inguinal lymph nodes and ipsilateral threatening of femoral vessels. A multi-specialty team was involved in the operation. A vascular and plastic surgeon performed the inguinal dissection with en bloc excision of the saphenous magna and a cuff of the femoral vein, while colorectal surgeons carried out the abdominoperineal excision. The 2 large tissue gaps at the groin and perineum were covered with an oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and a gluteal lotus flap, respectively. A partially absorbable mesh was placed at the level of the anterior sheath in order to reinforce the abdominal wall, whereas an absorbable mesh was used as a bridge for the dissected pelvic floor muscles. The post-operative period was uneventful and the follow-up at 5 months showed good results.

CONCLUSIONS: An early diagnosis along with new techniques of radiochemotherapy allow patients to preserve their sphincter function. However, a persistent or recurrent disease needs major operations, which often involve a complex reconstruction. Good team-work and experience in specialized fields give the opportunity to make the best choices to perform critical steps during the management of complex cases.

Keywords: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Lymph Node Excision, myocutaneous flap, Surgical Mesh

Background

Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy, with the majority of cases comprising anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), which accounts about 2–4% of all malignant colorectal tumors [1]. Despite its rarity, its incidence has increased over the last 4 decades, especially among men. Historically, ASCC has affected women at a greater rate than men, but US data reveals such a dramatic rise among males that a parity in the sex-specific annual incidence rate has been reached (about 2 per 100 000). Blacks have n higher annual mortality and incidence rate compared to whites, although it is unclear if disparities in cancer care affect these results [2]. However, in the UK, the sex trend was different because the incidence of ASCC increased 126% in women and 69% in men during a period of 20 years, from 1990 to 2010 [3].

Some aspects of ASCC carcinogenesis and etiology are similar to those of genital malignancies due to the close relation with Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Other predisposing factors include HIV infection, immune suppression after transplantation, Crohn’s disease, and smoking [1,2,4–6].

ASCC rarely spreads outside the pelvis, with a distant disease reported in less than 5% of patients. Nowadays, an integrated and personalized treatment including radiochemotherapy (RCT) and surgery is considered the standard of care [1]. In the most complex cases, joint operations with gynecologists, urologists, vascular, plastic, and colorectal surgeons are essential to achieve good results.

We present our successful management of ASCC with inguinal lymph node metastasis and threatening of femoral vessels treated with an abdominoperineal resection (APR), groin dissection, and closure of the inguinal defect with an oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ORAM) flap.

Case Report

A 50-year-old man complaining of perianal discomfort, pain, and PR bleeding along with bulky right inguinal lymph nodes (Figure 1) was referred to the Colorectal Unit. He was a heavy smoker, but without any other co-morbidities (BMI 24.76). An EUA found a right-sided fungating mass invading the anal verge and the perineal skin (Figure 2). Anal biopsies were positive for moderately differentiated keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, whereas right groin biopsy results were non-diagnostic. A staging MRI and PET/CT defined a tumor measuring 68×23 mm and extending to the skin of the natal cleft. The right inguinal lymph node with a necrotic center (56 mm) almost encased the right femoral vein without invading the lumen. There were no signs of distant disease (cT3N2M0).

The multi-disciplinary team decided to start the treatment with RCT (53.2 Gy in 28 daily fractions, which was delivered by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), associated with Mitomycin 12 mg/m2 during the first day and Capecitabin 825 mg/m2 during all the days of radiotherapy). Unfortunately, the patient missed the oncological outpatient appointment, causing a delay in the clinical evaluation and restaging, which was completed with MRI and PET/CT after 4 months from the end of the RCT. The anal cancer showed partial response (46 mm), but the inguinal lymph nodes were increased in volume to 62 mm. The major discomfort came from the inguinal mass that discharged serous fluid and resulted in Bacteroides fragilis infection. Antibiotic therapy with Metronidazole partially reduced the local edema and symptoms. Although morphine was necessary to control the pain when passing solid stool, the patient managed to keep a regular diet and maintain a stable weight.

The surgical operation was performed after 6 months from the end of the CRT. The first step was the groin dissection, which was performed by a plastic and vascular surgeon. Clear macroscopic lateral margins were achieved with a cranial approach over the external oblique fascia to femoral vessels. The femoral artery was not involved, but the saphenous magna vein was infiltrated and it was necessary to take a cuff of femoral vein to achieve negative margins (Figure 3). Cutaneous beaches of the femoral nerve were resected along with pectinous fascia and muscle (Figure 4). A left ORAM flap tunnelled subcutaneously to reach the groin was used to cover the defect (Figures 5–7). The second step was the abdominoperineal resection. A mid-line laparotomy was used to mobilize the sigmoid colon and achieve a low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery. The omental pedicle was vascularized by the left gastro-epiploic artery. The mesorectum was dissected down to the pelvic floor and the end colostomy was fashioned in the right iliac fossa. The posterior sheath of the abdominal wall was closed with a continuous suture of Polydioxanone, whereas at the level of the anterior sheath, a partly absorbable lightweight multifilament mesh was placed. In lithotomic position, the wide perineal ulcerating lesion and the left ischiorectal fossa fat with related lymph nodes were excised. The dissection continued up to the pelvic floor, with the removal of the coccyx, until meeting the abdominal dissection (Figures 8, 9). A drain was placed in the pelvis close to the omental flap. A bridge absorbable mesh was stitched to the pelvic floor remnant to reinforce the pelvis. A gluteal lotus flap was used to close the perineal defect (Figure 10).

The histopathology of the groin specimen showed a 60-mm tumor node with metastatic poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, extensive necrosis with perineurial, and lymphovascular invasion. The tumor extended close to, although it did not invade, the underlying skeletal muscle. The femoral vein wall was adherent to the neoplastic tissue with a tumor thrombus/embolus inside. The histopathology of the abdominoperineal excision showed a poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the perianal skin, 14 mm in size, 60 mm distant to the dentate line, and without margin involvement or tumor budding (R0 ypT1 L0 V0 N2 M0). In light of the pathological result, no further radio- or chemotherapy was needed.

The post-operative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 13th post-operative day. During the follow-up at 5 months after the operation, the wounds were well healed, there were no signs of lower-limb edema, and the patient only complained of moderate constipation.

Discussion

Radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for ASCC, whereas APR is usually reserved for patients presenting with recurrent or persistent disease [7]. Since ASCC rarely presents metastasis, the primary aim is local control with preservation of the anal sphincter, which can be obtained in most cases. Despite this, with doses of 50–60 Gy, anorectal function can be impaired [1,8]. New technologies (e.g., IMRT, rotational IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy, and stereotactic technique) have smaller margins and conformal plans, resulting in reduced radiational doses delivered to organs at risk, less acute toxicity, and shorter overall treatment time. Moreover, continuous radiosensitization is advisable to reinforce the efficiency and improve the sphincter preservation. In our case, a combination of Capecitabine and Mitomycin was administrated. Oral Capecitabine, converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) within the tumor, seems to be as tolerable and effective as intravenous 5-FU, which is more routinely utilized [9,10]. Furthermore, the benefits of Mitomycin in ASCC therapy are widely recognized and, although it has quick clearance, it lasts longer in hypoxic cells [11].

The overall 5-year survival rages from 71% to 79% depending on the study, but the outcomes for cT3/T4 cancer with nodal disease are less favorable, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 31–38% [12,13]. Klas et al. reported a 62% survival rate at the 32-month follow-up in patients with adjutant RCT and salvage APR [14].

The lymphatic drainage and the consequent lymph node metastasis depend on the relationship between the tumor and the dentate line: cancers located above the dentate line drain through the internal pudendal nodes into the internal iliac system, whereas tumors arising below the dentate line drain to the femoral and inguinal lymph nodes. The venous drainage follows a different path: the superior rectal/inferior mesenteric vein drains the blood from the upper half of the anal canal (portal system) and the inferior rectal vein from the lower half (systemic circulation). Also, the circumferential localization of the tumor is important: a carcinoma located laterally in the anal canal is more likely to metastasize to the lymph nodes of same side than the tumor midline location, which usually drains bilaterally [15].

Inguinal palpable lymph nodes are described in 16–25% of patients, and the probability of inguinal nodal involvement is about 20% in cT3/T4 cancers, with more than 50% of involved lymph nodes being <5 mm [1,15,16]. Although our patient had clear lymph node involvement without diagnostic discrepancy, a problem arises when metastatic lymph nodes are not evident to examination or imaging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be useful to detect micrometastasis in non-suspicious lymph nodes, and it can spare the groin from irradiation and clarify controversial diagnostic imaging [17–19]. Mistrangelo et al. showed that SLNB is more accurate than PET-CT in staging groin lymph nodes [20]. However, thanks to the introduction of IMRT, which reduces acute toxicity and skin and femoral head damage, SLNB is losing importance in avoiding inguinal irradiation. Moreover, there are concerns that a difficult and prolonged inguinal wound healing could delay the start of RCT. Supporting that, De Jong et al. reported that 24% of post-operative complications occur in the groin [17,18].

One of the most important long-term complications of inguinal lymph node dissection is lymphedema (8–69%). Patients with more and larger lymph nodes tend to present with an earlier stage of secondary lymphedema [21,22]. Although our case had large and deep lymph node disease, lymphedema did not occur either before or after the operation.

En bloc lymphadenectomy often requires wide margins and a deep tissue excision, with a consequent large secondary defect that exposes femoral vessels or does not close directly. Furthermore, wounds in this region, which were often previously irradiated, have a higher percentage of dehiscence, lymphorrhea (6–40%), and infection (6–20%). There are several flaps that can be utilized for the groin reconstruction, of which the most commonly used are the tensor fascia lata pedicled and anterolateral thigh flap, and the ventral or oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. The first has some potential drawbacks, which include a thin distal part and bulkiness proximally (the flap rotation creates a “dog ear” which may interfere with sitting), potential loss of knee stability, and excessive tension with consequent suture separation or skin necrosis. Anterolateral thigh flaps have extremely small perforators that tend to thrombose soon after congestion develops, and the sacrifice of the deep fascia is associated with pain and weakness of the thigh. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps have been largely used for the coverage of defects and protection of vessels in femoral and perineal regions because it provides an extensive cutaneous area, great thickness, no tension, good arch of rotation, well-vascularized tissue from a distal area to the irradiated groin, and a low rate of complications, with a single-stage procedure. In addition, when compared with the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, the ORAM flap allows surgeons to more easily close the donor site and reduce the amount of muscle taken from the abdominal wall. However, only the contralateral muscle can be used because the inferior epigastric vessels on the ipsilateral side are often divided during inguinal dissection, compromising the vascularization of the flap. For the same reason, previous cesarian sections and exploratory laparotomy are other contraindications. Because herniation or dehiscence have been reported in 9–17% of cases, stabilization of the donor site is recommended and is considered safe [22–25]. Furthermore, a decrease in maximum isometric flexion torque is reported to be about 20% at 1 year after the operation [26].

Since our patient had the groin defect closed with a myocutaneous flap and the perineal excision was not too extended, the wound was closed with a mesh and a lotus skin flap in order to avoid a further donor site dissection and become a source of possible additional complications. Despite this, myocutaneous flaps can be safely used to fill perineal defects because they reduce the duration of the wound healing and have a lower morbidity. In fact, primary closure is more than twice as likely to be associated with perineal complications compared with flap closure [27–30]. Biologic mesh has recently been introduced as an alternative form of reconstruction in order to improve perineal wound healing and reduce the perineal hernia rate. The mesh can be placed as an inlay or bridge across the defect and sutured to the origin of the elevator muscles. It has been suggested that biological mesh allows native cellular ingrowth, promotes tissue remodelling, acts as a physical barrier supporting the pelvic contents, and minimizes the pressure on the skin and ischiorectal fat during the healing process. Despite the limited current data, reconstruction with mesh seems to have no significant difference in complication rate and has a shorter operative time compared with flap repair [31,32].

Conclusions

This is the first described case, with good results and no complications, in which 2 flaps were used to cover large gaps left by the extensive oncological dissections. ASCC is a rare tumor, and an early diagnosis along with new techniques of RCT allow patients to preserve their sphincter function. In contrast, a persistent or recurrent disease needs major operations, which often involve a complex reconstruction. The involvement of gynecologists, urologists, and plastic and vascular surgeons is essential to decide the best approach, perform a good operation, and minimize post-operative complications. Good team-work and experience in specialized fields give the opportunity to make the best choices to properly perform critical steps during the management of complex cases.

References:

1.. Glynne-Jones R, Salem W, Harrison M, Background and current treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: Oncol Ther, 2016; 4; 135-72, pmid: 28261646

2.. Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM, Anal cancer incidence and survival: The surveillance, epidemiology and end results experience, 1973– 2000: Cancer, 2004; 101; 281288

3.. Wilkinson JR, Morris EJ, Downing A, The rising incidence of anal cancer in England 1990–2010: A population-based study: Colorectal Dis, 2014; 16(7); O234-39, pmid: 24410872

4.. Jamel A, Simard EP, Dorell C, Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2009. featuring the burden and trends in human papillomavirus – associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels: J Natl Cancer Inst, 2013; 105; 175-201, pmid: 23297039

5.. Granata V, Fusco R, Reginelli A, Radiological assessment of anal cancer: An overview and update: Infect Agent Cancer, 2016; 11; 52, pmid: 27752279

6.. Szmulowicz UM, Wu JS, Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: A review of the etiology, presentation, staging, prognosis and methods available for treatment: Sex Health, 2012; 9(6); 593-609, pmid: 22951027

7.. Glynne-Jones R, Rao S, Treatment of the primary tumour in anal canal cancers: Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2017; 26(1); 73-90, pmid: 27889038

8.. Bentzen AG, Guren MG, Vonen B, Faecal incontinence after chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer survivors: Long-term results of a national cohort: Radiother Oncol, 2013; 108(1); 55-60, pmid: 23891095

9.. Deenen MJ, Dewit L, Boot H, Simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiation therapy with concomitant capecitabine and mitomycin C for locally advanced anal carcinoma: A phase 1 study: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013; 85(5); e201-7, pmid: 23517808

10.. Thind G, Johal B, Follwell M, Kennecke HF, Chemoradiation with capecitabine and mitomycin-C for stage I–III anal squamous cell carcinoma: Radiat Oncol, 2014; 29(9); 124

11.. Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F, Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups: J Clin Oncol, 1997; 15(5); 2040-49, pmid: 9164216

12.. Gunderson LL, Moughan J, Ajani JA, Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013; 87(4); 638-45, pmid: 24035327

13.. Baughman DM, Shah BK, Disparities in receipt of radiotherapy and survival age, sex and race among patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: J Gastrointest Oncol, 2016; 7(6); 968-73, pmid: 28078120

14.. Klas JV, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Madoff RD, Malignant tumors of the anal canal: the spectrum of disease, treatment and outcomes: Cancer, 1999; 85(8); 1686-93, pmid: 10223561

15.. Tehranian S, Treglia G, Krag DN, Sentinel node mapping in anal canal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis: J Gastrointestinal Liver Dis, 2013; 22; 321-28

16.. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F, Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: Experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature: Cancer, 2001; 92(1); 77-84, pmid: 11443612

17.. Swan MC, Furniss D, Cassell OCS, Surgical management of metastatic inguinal lynphoadenopathy: BMJ, 2004; 329; 1272-76, pmid: 15564260

18.. De Jong JS, Beukema JC, Van Dam GM, Limited value of staging squamous cell carcinoma of the anal margin and canal using the sentinel node lymph node procedure: Prospective study with long term follow up: Am Surg Oncol, 2010; 17; 2656-62

19.. De Nardi P, Carvello M, Staudacher C, New approach to anal cancer: Individualised therapy based on sentinel lymph node biopsy: World J Gastroenterol, 2012; 18(44); 6349-56, pmid: 23197880

20.. Mistrangelo M, Pelosi E, Bellò M, Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of inguinal node metastases in patients with anal cancer: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010; 77; 73-78, pmid: 19632066

21.. Onoda S, Kimata Y, Yamada K, Relationship of the number and size of the superficial groin lymph nodes with the stage of secondary lymphatic edema: J Surg Oncol, 2016; 114(8); 940-46, pmid: 27709601

22.. Murthy V, Gopinath KS, Reconstruction of groin defects following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: An evidence based review: Indian J Surg Oncol, 2012; 3(2); 130-38, pmid: 23730102

23.. Mao C, Peng X, Qu J, The effectiveness of prolene patch in hernia prevention following harvesting rectus abdomens myocutaneous flap: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2001; 15(6); 335-37, pmid: 11762216

24.. Navarro-Sanchez A, Von Room AC, Thomas RL, Soft tissue sarcoma in the tight and groin. Reconstruction using ventral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: Cir Esp, 2014; 92; 693-94, pmid: 23578716

25.. Daigeler A, Simidjiiska-Belyaeva M, Drucke D, The versatility of the pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in oncologic patients: Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011; 396(8); 1271-79, pmid: 21779830

26.. Daigeler A, Simidjiiska-Belyaeva M, Drücke D, The versatility of the pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in oncologic patients: Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011; 396(8); 1271-79, pmid: 21779830

27.. Hardt J, Mai S, Weib C, Abdominoperineal resection and perineal wound healing in recurrent, persistent or primary anal carcinoma: Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016; 31(6); 1197-203, pmid: 27033699

28.. Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016; 137(5); 1602-13, pmid: 26796372

29.. Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016; 137(5); 1602-13, pmid: 26796372

30.. Barker T, Branagan G, Wright E, Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the perineal defect after abdominoperineal excision is associated with low morbidity: Colorectal Dis, 2013; 15(9); 1177-83, pmid: 23672636

31.. Alam NN, Narang SK, Kockerling F, Biologic mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extra elevator abdominoperineal excision: A systematic review: Front Surg, 2016; 3; 9, pmid: 26909352

32.. Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, Reconstruction of perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: A systematic review: Colorectal Dis, 2012; 14(9); 1052-59, pmid: 22762519

In Press

Case report  China

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdev...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976  

Case report  Greece

Multilevel Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Low Back Pain in Achondroplasia: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290  

Case report  Italy

Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607  

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Postoperative Corneal Dellen Following PreserFlo MicroShunt: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Dec 2021 : Case report  USA 17,691,734

Edwardsiella tarda: A Classic Presentation of a Rare Fatal Infection, with Possible New Background Risk Fac...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil 164,491

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

21 Jun 2024 : Case report  China (mainland) 113,090

Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371

0:00

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 59,175

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923