03 May 2018: Articles
Congenital Esophageal Atresia and Microtia in a Newborn Secondary to Mycophenolate Mofetil Exposure During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Adverse events of drug therapy, Congenital defects / diseases, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Musaed Mohammed Alsebayel ABCEF 1*, Faisal Abdulrahman Abaalkhail ADE 2,3, Faisal Mohammed Alsebayel BE 1, Dema A. Alissa BDE 4, Ahmed Hamdan Al-Jedai BDE 3,4, Hussien Elsiesy ADEF 2,3DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.908433
Am J Case Rep 2018; 19:523-526
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs to prevent organ transplant rejection in combination with calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. It has a different toxicity profile than tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Gastrointestinal tract disturbances are the most common adverse effects. The use of MMF in pregnant women, however, holds great risk of miscarriage and fetal development defects such as external ear malformation, ocular anomalies, cleft lip and palate, and abnormality of distal limbs, heart, esophagus, and kidneys. Based on post-marketing studies, its pregnancy category was reclassified as category D by the US FDA in 2007.
CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman received a deceased-donor liver transplant for end-stage liver disease secondary to autoimmune hepatitis. She had 3 miscarriages while on MMF. In her fourth pregnancy she was exposed to MMF in the first trimester, which was stopped by week 20 of the pregnancy. Obstetric ultrasound suggested a cephalic presentation fetus with abdominal circumference. Her pregnancy resulted in an infant with tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal atresia, and a bilateral ear canal atresia (microtia) with normal sensorineural conduction. There were no other congenital abnormalities. Thoracoscopic ligation of fistula and thoracotomy with esophageal repair were performed and a bone-anchored hearing aid for conductive hearing loss was implanted. Here, we report a case of congenital esophageal atresia and microtia secondary to mycophenolate mofetil.
CONCLUSIONS: MMF should be avoided during pregnancy. Transplanted female patients of reproductive age should receive appropriate counseling.
Keywords: Congenital Abnormalities, esophageal atresia, Teratogens
Background
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept®) is one of the most commonly prescribed immunosuppressant drugs used to prevent organ transplant rejection [1]. In the United States, 89.9% of
Case Report
A 20-year-old woman received a deceased-donor liver transplant secondary to autoimmune hepatitis in 2001 that resulted in liver cirrhosis and end-stage liver failure. The medical record of the patient and her son were retrospectively analyzed after obtaining consent from her and her son and approval of the Research Ethics Committee of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC). Her initial immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, prednisolone, and MMF (CellCept®). On September 2006, MMF (CellCept®) was stopped. The donor was hepatitis B core antibody (HbcAb)-positive; therefore, the recipients received lamivudine throughout this period as a prophylaxis for
Discussion
Mycophenolic acid derivatives have been associated with a specific pattern of congenital anomalies that include microtia, cleft lip and palate, external auditory canal atresia, ocular anomalies, diaphragmatic hernia, and congenital heart defects [9–14]. Esophageal atresia associated with prenatal exposure to mycophenolic acid has been described in 9 patients who also had other associated malformations. Hoeltzenbein et al., Schonar et al., and Parisi et al. reported cases of several congenital malformations in which mothers were receiving mycopheno-late therapy, among other medications [14–17]. Martin et al. reported 4 cases of esophageal atresia; 2 of these cases matched the proposed embryopathy phenotype (cleft palate and lip, external auditory canal atresia, congenital heart defects, and microtia) [18]. The other 2 cases presented with esophageal atresia with other milder manifestations; one with patent foramen ovale and mild facial anomalies, and the other patient was diagnosed with congenital dorsal hemivertebra. The patients did not show any association between the periods of prenatal exposure to mycophenolic acid and the reported congenital anomalies [13,14].
In our case, the fetus was exposed to MMF until the 20th week of pregnancy. In 2007, Roche Laboratories, Inc. issued a drug warning indicating that MMF use during pregnancy is associated with increased pregnancy loss and congenital malformation, especially external ear and facial malformations, as well as anomalies of distal limbs, heart, esophagus, and kidneys. Based on the post-marketing data and the US National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry, the US FDA changed the MMF pregnancy category from C to D [12]. Since steroids and tacrolimus are not known to cause this pattern of anomalies, the most likely cause is MMF teratogenicity. Our patient had 2 uneventful pregnancies after discontinuation of MMF, while still on steroids, tacrolimus, and lamivudine.
Conclusions
The use of mycophenolic acid derivatives during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of esophageal atresia and microtia. Its use should be avoided in women of reproductive age who are pregnant or planning to get pregnant. Counseling patients about its risk and the importance of contraception and pregnancy planning should be emphasized.
References:
1.. Allison AC, Eugui EM, Purine metabolism and immunosuppressive effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF): Clin Transplant, 1996; 10; 77-84, pmid: 8680053
2.. , Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 2010 data report.: Am J Transplant, 2012; 12(Suppl. 1); 1-156
3.. Ransom JT, Mechanism of action of mycophenolate mofetil: Ther Drug Monit, 1995; 17; 681-84, pmid: 8588241
4.. Suthanthiran M, Morris RE, Strom TB, Immunosuppressants: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action: Am J Kidney Dis, 1996; 28; 159-72, pmid: 8768909
5.. De Mattos AM, Olyaei AJ, Bennett WM, Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: Long-term consequences and challenges for the future: Am J Kidney Dis, 2000; 35; 333-46, pmid: 10676738
6.. Zachariah MS, Tornatore KM, Venuto RC, Kidney transplantation and pregnancy: Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2009; 14; 386-91, pmid: 19512929
7.. Perez-Aytes A, Marin-Reina P, Boso V, Mycophenolate mofetil embryopathy: A newly recognized teratogenic syndrome: Eur J Med Genet, 2017; 60(1); 16-21, pmid: 27639443
8.. Dei Malatesta M, Rocca B, Gentile T, A case of coloboma in a newborn to a woman taking mycophenolate mofetil in pregnancy after kidney transplantation: Transplant Proc, 2009; 41(4); 1407-9, pmid: 19460573
9.. Merlob P, Stahl B, Klinger G, Tetrada of the possible mycophenolate mofetil embryopathy: A review: Reprod Toxicol, 2009; 28; 105-8, pmid: 19491002
10.. Anderka MT, Lin AE, Abuelo DN, Reviewing the evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as a new teratogen: Case report and review of the literature: Am J Med Genet A, 2009; 149A; 1241-48, pmid: 19441125
11.. Armenti VT, Radomski JS, Moritz MJ, Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): Outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation: Clin Transpl, 2003; 131-41, pmid: 15387104
12.. , Important changes in the CellCept [mycophenolate mofetil] prescribing information.: Use of CellCept is associated with increased pregnancy loss and congenital malformations/change from pregnancy category C to pregnancy category D 2007. Available at:
13.. Lin AE, Singh KE, Strauss A, An additional patient with mycophenolate mofetil embryopathy: cardiac and facial analyses: Am J Med Genet A, 2011; 155; 748-56
14.. Hoeltzenbein M, Elefant E, Vial T, Teratogenicity of mycophenolate confirmed in a prospective study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services: Am J Med Genet A, 2012; 158; 588-96
15.. Källén B, Westgren M, Aberg A, Olausson PO, Pregnancy outcome after maternal organ transplantation in Sweden: BJOG, 2005; 112; 904-9, pmid: 15957990
16.. Schoner K, Steinhard J, Figiel J, Rehder H, Severe facial clefts in acrofacial dysostosis: A consequence of prenatal exposure to mycophenolate mofetil?: Obstet Gynecol, 2008; 111; 483-86, pmid: 18238994
17.. Parisi MA, Zayed H, Slavotinek AM, Rutledg JC, Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and microtia in a newborn with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) exposure: Phenocopy for Fryns syndrome or broad spectrum of teratogenic effects?: Am J Med Genet A, 2009; 149; 1237-40
18.. Martín MC, Cristiano E, Villanueva M, Esophageal atresia and prenatal exposure to mycophenolate: Reprod Toxicol, 2014; 50; 117-21, pmid: 25461910
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






