09 August 2018
: Case report
Pericardial Tamponade Caused by Perforation of Marshall Vein During Left Jugular Central Venous Catheterization
Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Congenital defects / diseases
Muhammad U. Butt1EFG*, John C. Gurley1AB, Alison L. Bailey2AD, Claude S. Elayi1AEFDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.909005
Am J Case Rep 2018; 19:932-934
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The persistence of a vein of Marshall (VoM) from the left subclavian vein to the coronary sinus is a rare cardiac anomaly known as a persistent left superior vena cava (PLVC). This anatomical variant is usually asymptomatic but can lead to serious complications during catheterization via the left subclavian or internal jugular vein, as described here. In our case, the patent vein of Marshall directly connected the coronary sinus with the left subclavian vein discovered in a cardiac arrest patient because of pericardial effusion during the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC).
CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old patient required a central line insertion through a left internal jugular vein. The patient immediately went into cardiac arrest after CVC insertion with a pericardial effusion. The patient was successfully resuscitated with the drainage of a pericardial effusion. A chest X-ray revealed that the central venous catheter (CVC) was located along the left border of the mediastinum rather than the right border. It was evident that the central venous catheter was inadvertently placed into the pericardial space, resulting in tamponade. This complication occurred through inadvertent access of a small persistent vein of Marshall.
CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the importance of knowledge of anatomical variants of the persistent vein of Marshall to prevent or correctly interpret and manage procedural complications.
Keywords: Cardiac Tamponade, Catheterization, Central Venous, Jugular Veins
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
19 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936370
17 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936651
13 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936589
13 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936574
In Press
24 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936600
23 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935148
23 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936704
20 May 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936826
Most Viewed Current Articles
23 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250
17 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
19 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935355
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935355