Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

11 July 2018: Articles  Italy

Practical Suggestions for Prevention of Complications Arising from Oxidized Cellulose Retention: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)

Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi ABCDEF 1*, Elisa Reitano AE 1, Valerio Panizzo BCD 2, Barbara Rubino BCD 3, Davide Bona CD 2, Domenico Tringali BCE 2, Giancarlo Micheletto ABCD 2,4

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.910060

Am J Case Rep 2018; 19:812-819

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. When conventional methods such as ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective for bleeding management, hemostatic agents should be used. Oxidized cellulose is one of the major hemostatic agents used worldwide. Oxidized cellulose is often left in situ after hemostasis because of its high level of reabsorption that lasts up to 8 weeks. However, 38 cases of retaining-associated complications are reported in the literature.

CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old male patient presented in our emergency department with acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The patient had been admitted in our department for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis 25 months previously. Abdominal ultrasound and CT scan showed the presence of a cystic circular mass, with homogeneous fluid content, close to the surgical clips of the previous surgery, resembling a “neogallbladder”. Laparoscopic abdominal exploration and drainage were performed. Histological examination reported protein-based amorphous material with rare lymphocytes and macrophages. Culturing was negative for bacterial growth. The patient was discharged uneventfully on the 4 th postoperative day. The primary surgical report was evaluated with evidence of application of Gelita-Cel ® Standard for hemostatic purposes. Results of 12-month follow-up were normal.

CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we report the first case of a complication associated with the use of Gelita-Cel ® Standard. We reviewed the literature to better define the purpose and limits of oxidized cellulose use as a hemostatic agent. Despite the fundamental role of oxidized cellulose as a hemostatic agent, we provide some practical suggestions to prevent the reported severe complications and surgical overtreatments.

Keywords: Cellulose, Oxidized, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Diagnosis, Differential, Hemostasis, Surgical, Postoperative Complications

Background

Successful hemostasis has always been fundamental in all surgical procedures. Ligature and diathermocoagulation are the main hemostatic methods; however, since 1909, with the use of fibrin [1], numerous hemostatic agents (HA) have become available. In 1945, oxidized cellulose (OC) was introduced in surgery and it has become one of the major HAs because of its ease of use, favorable biocompatibility, and bactericidal properties [2–4]. Several OCs are available and classified in regenerated oxidized cellulose (ROC; e.g. Surgicel® – Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA) and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose (nROC; e.g., Oxycell® – Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Although the manufacturers recommend the OC removal after its use, it is generally left in situ because of its high level of reabsorption that lasts up to 8 weeks. However, several cases of retained OC with severe complications have been reported in the literature. Here, we describe a complication that was associated with the use of Gelita-Cel® Standard (ROC; Gelita Medical, Eberbach, Germany) and we review the literature to better define the purpose and limits of OC as a hemostatic agent.

Case Report

A 51-year-old male patient presented in our emergency department with acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Laboratory test results were normal with no evidence of inflammation markers (white blood cells: 8.03×103/µl; neutrophils: 68.2%; C reactive protein: 3 mg/l). He had been admitted to our department for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis 25 months previously. The patient complained of moderate abdominal pain since his first operation; therefore, he had abdominal CT scan at 6 months, showing evidence of a circular mass (39×34 mm) with fluid content (density 35–45 HU). In addition, an abdominal US at 24 months showed a non-vascularized mass in the liver bed that was suspected to be a granuloma. The patient was admitted for an abdominal CT scan and the results confirmed a circular cystic mass with homogeneous fluid content, close to the surgical clips of the previous surgery, resembling a “neo-gallbladder” (Figure 1). Although the patient had no signs of inflammation or infection, a hepatic abscess was suspected based on imaging results and previous surgical history. To better define the patient’s unclear clinical condition, we chose to perform a surgical drainage instead of a percutaneous (US- or CT-guided). Therefore, the patient underwent laparoscopic abdominal exploration, incision of the hepatic bed mass, and drainage of amorphous, brown, dense material (Figure 2). A drain was left in the liver bed and was removed on the 2st postoperative day. Histological examination reported protein-based amorphous material with rare lymphocytes and macrophages. Culturing was negative for bacterial growth. After antibiotic prophylaxis with extended spectrum B-lactam, the patient was discharged without symptoms on the 4th postoperative day. The primary surgical report was evaluated for evidence of use of Gelita-Cel® Standard for hemostatic purposes. The 12-month follow-up was uneventful.

Discussion

Bleeding can be a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. When conventional methods such as ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective for bleeding management, hemostatic agents (HA) can be used. In 1909, fibrin was described as an effective HA [1] and since then numerous hemostatic devices have been used such as topical thrombin, porcine collagen, and OC [5]. OC was first used for medical purposes in 1945 [2,3], and since then it has been widely used in surgery, with several forms available. OC is easy to use and has good biocompatibility and bactericidal properties [4]. OC is made of cellulose, which is a homopolysaccharide of glucopyranose polymerized through β-glucosidic bonds [6,7]. Cellulose can be either regenerated to form organized fibers or non-regenerated with unorganized fibers prior to oxidation. When cellulose fibres are oxidized, conversion of hydroxyl groups to carboxylic acid groups occurs, yielding polyuronic acid [6,7]. The low pH of the carboxylic acid groups is responsible for several actions: primary local hemostyptic action, secondary platelet activation to form a temporary platelet plug [6,7], and hostile acidic environmental conditions for bacterial survival [8]. Moreover, the knit structure and thickness of the gauge is responsible for bactericidal properties, with thinner loose-knit patterns being less effective than thicker tight-knit patterns against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms [9].

Oxidized regenerated cellulose (ROC) is a re-absorbable material that can be intentionally left in the surgical field. In vivo studies on rats were performed to analyze the tissue reaction to locally implanted hemostatic agents [10]. ROC absorption starts after 24–48 h; at day 7 the gauze is surrounded by inflammatory granulation tissue, and complete degradation occurs between 4–8 weeks [6,10,11]. However, absorption is not always complete, with consequent gauze retention as first described by Vanderhoof et al. [12]. Therefore, it is common for ROC to appear as a mass during the immediate postoperative period, mimicking a postoperative abscess [13], tumor [14], or hematoma [15], posing a serious challenge in differential diagnosis [16].

On CT scan, a retained OC may appear as a mixed- or low-attenuation mass containing a focal central collection of gas, located inside or near the operative site, with a faint enhancement at the mass periphery and absence of air-fluid levels [13,17,18] (Table 1). Over time, the central collection of air is completely replaced by soft tissue, leading to the formation of a foreign-body granuloma [13].

MRI findings are nonspecific, but the presence of hypoin-tense stripes inside a cystic-like cavity on T2-weighted images is considered to be a characteristic sign of ROC-associated granuloma [19].

PET/CT images may produce false-positive results in case of foreign body granuloma as a consequence of localized inflammation, mimicking malignant tissue glucose uptake [20–22].

Retained OC is frequently found in ultrasound imaging (US) as a complex mass or well-encapsulated hypo-isoechoic lesion with circumscribed margins and internal hyperechoic nodules at the surgical site [23]. The presence of hyper-isoechoic nodules within a complex cystic mass can be explained as typical granulomatous foreign body reaction induced by the presence of ROC and was described by Giuliani et al. as “ileflottante” [23,24]. Moreover, the use of color/power Doppler should be considered as part of the ultrasound procedure. A perilesional vascularization is probably indicative of compression exerted by OC on neighboring tissues or connected to the presence of granulation tissue around the surgical site [25,26]. Nevertheless, imaging can be useful and clinical evaluation is fundamental in confirming diagnostic suspicion.

We reviewed the literature and retrieved a total of 28 papers comprising 38 cases of OC retention. The details of cases are shown in Table 2. Surgical sites included: brain (6), cervical spine (1), thoracic spine (1), thorax (10), abdomen (12), and pelvis (8). Twenty-nine patients received Surgicel ®, 2 received Oxycel®, 1 received Surgiflo® (Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA), and 6 received non-specified OC (Table 2). Here, we report the first case of complications due to Gelita-Cel® retention.

The preoperative diagnosis and surgical procedure are described in Table 2. The times from primary surgery to detection of retained OC ranged between 2 hours and 630 days. Twelve cases were incidental and the others were symptomatic. Various symptoms were described, ranging from malaise and fever to paraplegia, cauda equina syndrome, and vision impairment. Diagnostic suspicion was tumor recurrence (6), abscess (7), cord compression (6), granuloma (4), extradural mass (3), heterogeneous mass (3), gas collection (2), kidney tumor (2), ovarian cancer (1), hematoma (1), abscess/hematoma (1), granuloma/neoplasm (1), and non-specified lesion (1). Gauze removal was performed in 27 cases. In 2 patients, removal of the gauze required a major procedure: 1 patient underwent nephrectomy and another had allograft extirpation that resulted in need for dialysis.

Despite the fundamental importance of OC as an essential hemostatic agent in surgery, some precautions are needed to avoid future complications. Although 38 cases, in addition to our reported case, are very few compared to all surgical procedures performed with OC use with no associated complication, complications may also be severe and associated with risky surgical procedures.

Our review of the literature found that 8 patients experienced paraplegia, which occurred between 2 hours and 2 days after thoracic surgery [27–29]; cord compression was suspected and urgent laminectomy was performed, revealing a mass of Surgicel® in the extradural space. A surgical report showed the use of OC to control difficult bleeding from the posterior angle of the thoracotomy incision. The posterior end of the rib adjacent to the gaping thoracostomy is usually a bleeding site that is hard to manage. During thoracostomy closure, the rib approximation may produce a compressive force on the OC, forcing it to migrate into the adjacent foramen. The established negative pressure of the intravertebral subdural space can enhance this pressure gradient and cause OC herniation with consequent symptomatology [26]. Product information warns against leaving OC in situ next to foramina after hemostasis due to swelling, which can result in nerve damage due to pressure in a bony confined area [30]. However, there is no report regarding the potential of material migration. Five out of 6 patients presented with total motor and sensory deficit, with extension according to the cord compression site [27–29]: one had spastic monoplegia involving the right leg [28], one patient has to use a cane to walk [27], and one has walking impairment requiring leg braces and obligatory catheterization [27].

In circumstances requiring extensive dissection in the costovertebral angle, precise technique is imperative. Uncontrolled or poorly controlled bleeding in an intervertebral foramen should be an indication for consultation of a neurological surgeon.

Dutton et al. [32] reported a case of compressive optic neuropathy after OC migration from the anterior cranial fossa into the orbital apex through an orbital roof fracture. Banerjee et al. [33] reported a case of cauda equina syndrome treated with OC removal and consequent severe impairment of quality of life. To avoid major complications, particular attention must be paid to hemostatic control in rigid inextensible anatomical structures such as the skull and spinal cord.

In 9 cases, tumor mass or neoplasm recurrence was suspected, with consequent resective treatment. Somani et al. [34] reported a case of clinically/radiologically suspected renal cell carcinoma in a patient who previously underwent splenectomy for myelofibrosis, evidenced as an heterogenous kidney mass formation on abdominal CT scan with paraortic lymph-adenopathy. Nephrectomy was performed, but histology did not show a neoplasm and instead found a foreign-material granuloma. This is an important case of retained OC mimicking a neoplasm. Azmy et al. [35] reported a case of OC removal in a patient suspected to have a recurrence of neuroblastoma.

Royds et al. [36] documented the first case of local tissue reaction associated with Surgicel® in head and neck surgery, with removal and resolution confirming its cause. Concha et al. [37] reported a case of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis caused by OC retention in a renal allograft, with consequent extirpation of the allograft and return to dialysis in a 41-year-old patient. Arnold et al. [38] documented an abscess mimicking a mass following cholecystectomy and liver biopsy.

Among all 38 cases described, plus our reported case, 11 patients were treated conservatively due to suspicion of an OC-retaining lesion after surgical history evaluation and multidisciplinary analysis by surgeons and radiologists. Although retained OC has been described by many authors [27–29,31,32,34–56], we believe it is important to focus on the cases in which there were severe complications in order to form some conclusions and recommendations

The manufacturers recommend OC removal after hemostasis is obtained. If the surgeon decides to leave an OC gauze in situ, it should be used sparingly, as many problems have been attributed to excessive use [45]. If OC is left in situ, the surgical report and the discharge document should state it in order to correctly inform the patient in detail about this condition.

In surgical procedures in rigid inextensible anatomical structures as the skull, spinal cord, and pleural cavity (in proximity to the spine), OC should be used with extreme care and, if possible, neurosurgical support should be used for better and safer hemostasis [32] (Table 3).

Moreover, when a mass is observed, accurate imaging evaluation and surgical history are required to assess a possible retained granulomatous lesion and to provide the best medical/surgical treatment.

Further studies are needed to determine if layer versus coiled disposal of oxidized cellulose may have a role in complications and to assess whether fibrillar oxidized cellulose is safer than the gauze form. Our surgical case report is fully compliant with the SCARE criteria [57].

Conclusions

Bleeding is a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. OC is an effective aid in hemostasis when ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective. Despite biocompatibility and reabsorption, cases of retained OC complications have been described in the literature. OC should be removed when hemostasis is obtained. If necessary, only a small quantity of OC should be placed in situ and it should be documented in the surgical report and the discharge document in order to correctly inform the patient. Accurate surgical history evaluation should always be performed, and multidisciplinary case evaluation between surgeons and radiologists should be done to achieve a more accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary revision surgery or further medical and/or surgical interventions. In case of surgical procedures with hemostatic control in rigid inextensible anatomical structures such as the skull and spinal cord, OC should be used with extreme care in order to avoid major complications and, if possible, neurosurgical support should be used for better and safer hemostasis. We also presented the first case of a complication following Gelita-Cel® retention in a case of “neo-gallbladder”. Our aim here is not to criticize the use of OC as hemostatic agent – it has well-documented effectiveness in surgery – but rather to provide some practical suggestions on how to avoid the severe complications reported in the literature.

References:

1.. Hong YM, Loughlin KR, The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology: J Urol, 2006; 176; 2367-74, pmid: 17085103

2.. Frantz VK, Lattes R, Oxidized cellulose-absorbable gauze (cellulosic acid): JAMA, 1945; 129; 798-801

3.. Frantz VK, Absorbable cotton, paper and gauze: (Oxidized cellulose): Ann Surg, 1943; 118; 116-26, pmid: 17858245

4.. Lewis KM, Spazierer D, Urban MD, Comparison of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostatic agents: Eur Surg, 2013; 45; 213-20, pmid: 23950762

5.. Spotnitz WD, Burks SG, Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives II: Update as well as how and when to use the components of the surgical toolbox: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2010; 16; 497-514, pmid: 20699255

6.. Pierce AM, Wiebkin OW, Wilson DF, Surgicel: Its fate following implantation: J Oral Pathol, 1984; 13(6); 661-70, pmid: 6440959

7.. Miller JM, Jackson DA, Collier CS, An investigation of the chemical reactions of oxidized regenerated cellulose: Exp Med Surgery, 1961; 19; 196-201

8.. Dineen P, The effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose on experimental infected splenotomies: J Surg Res, 1977; 23; 114-16, pmid: 886839

9.. Spangler D, Rothenburger S, Nguyen K: Surg Infect, 2003; 4; 255-62

10.. Alpaslan C, Alpaslan GH, Oygur T, Tissue reaction to three subcutaneously implanted local hemosatic agents: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1997; 35; 129-32, pmid: 9146872

11.. Mayank M, Agarwal MM, Mandal AK, Surgicel granuloma: Unusual cause of recurrent mass lesion after laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: Urology, 2010; 76; 334-35, pmid: 20494418

12.. Vanderhoof ES, Merendino KA, Unfavorable reactions to oxidized cellulose in the bed of the gallbladder; the retained Oxycel sponge syndrome: Arch Surg, 1949; 58; 182-88, pmid: 18111733

13.. Young ST, Paulson EK, McCann RL, Baker ME, Appearance of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) on postoperative CT scans: Similarity to postoperative abscess: Am J Roentgenol, 1993; 160; 275-77, pmid: 8424333

14.. Sandhu GS, Elexpuru-Camiruaga JA, Buckley S, Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) granulomata mimicking tumour recurrence: Br J Neurosurg, 1996; 10; 617-19, pmid: 9115663

15.. van Gelderen F, Swinnen J, Appearance of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) on abdominal radiographs: Am J Roentgenol, 1996; 167; 1593

16.. Kim SR, Baik HK, Park YW, Retained surgical sponge presenting as a pelvic tumor after 25 years: Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003; 82; 223-25, pmid: 12873788

17.. O’Connor AR, Coakley FV, Meng MV, Eberhardt SC, Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis: Am J Roentgenol, 2003; 180; 481-89, pmid: 12540456

18.. Mausner EV, Yitta S, Slywotzky CM, Bennett GL, Commonly encountered foreign bodies and devices in the female pelvis: MDCT appearances: Am J Roentgenol, 2011; 196; W461-70, pmid: 21427312

19.. Oto A, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, MR characteristics of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel): Am J Roentgenol, 1999; 172; 1481-84, pmid: 10350276

20.. Yuh-Feng T, Chin-Chu W, Cheng-Tau S, Min-Tsung T, FDG PET CT features of an intraabdominal gossypiboma: Clin Nucl Med, 2005; 30; 561-63, pmid: 16024957

21.. Ghersin E, Keidar Z, Brook OR, A new pitfall on abdominal PET/CT: A retained surgical sponge: J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2004; 28; 839-41, pmid: 15538161

22.. Vertechy L, di Francesco L, Musella A, Nonabsorbable suture granuloma mimicking ovarian cancer recurrence at combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography evaluation: A case report: J Med Case, 2014; 8; 202

23.. Giuliani M, Fubelli R, Patrolecco F, Mammographic and ultrasonograph -ic findings of oxidized regenerated cellulose in breast cancer surgery: A 5-year experience.: Clin Breast Cancer, 2015; 15(5); e249-56, pmid: 25922282

24.. Kwag H, Imaging findings of implanted absorbable mesh in patients with breast partial resection: Yonsei Med J, 2008; 49; 111-18, pmid: 18306477

25.. Bäz E, Madjar H, Reuss C: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 15; 377-82, pmid: 10976477

26.. Stuhrmann M, Aronius R, Schietzel M, Tumor vascularity of breast lesions: Potentials and limits of contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography: Am J Roentgenol, 2000; 175; 1585-89, pmid: 11090380

27.. Brodbelt AR, Miles JB, Foy PM, Broome JC, Intraspinal oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) causing delayed paraplegia after thoracotomy – a report of three cases: Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2002; 84(2); 97-99, pmid: 11995773

28.. Short HD, Paraplegia associated with the use of oxidized cellulose in posterolateral thoracotomy incisions: Ann Thorac Surg, 1990; 50(2); 288-89, pmid: 2200364

29.. Løvstad RZ, Steen PA, Forsman M, Paraplegia after thoracotomy – not caused by the epidural catheter: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1993; 43(2); 230-32

30.. Ordell NJ: Physician’s desk reference, 1989; 1058, Medical Economics Company, Inc

31.. Perez-Guerra F, Holland JM, Epidural hematoma as a cause of postpneumonectomy paraplegia: Ann Thorac Surg, 1985; 39(3); 282, pmid: 3977474

32.. Dutton JJ, Tse DT, Anderson RL, Compressive optic neuropathy following use of intracranial oxidized cellulose hemostat: Ophthalmic Surg, 1983; 6; 487-89

33.. Banerjee T, Goldschmidt K, ‘Surgiceloma’ manifested as cauda equina syndrome: South Med J, 1998; 91(5); 481-83, pmid: 9598861

34.. Somani BK, Kasthuri RS, Shave RM, Emtage LA, Surgicel granuloma mimicking a renal tumour: Surgery, 2006; 139(3); 451, pmid: 16546514

35.. Azmy AF, Oxidized cellulose haemostat mimicking a possible recurrence of neuroblastoma: BJU Int, 2001; 88(3); 295-96, pmid: 11488748

36.. Royds J, Kieran S, Timon C, Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) based reaction post thyroidectomy mimicking an abscess: A case report: Int J Surg Case Rep, 2012; 3(7); 338-39, pmid: 22572542

37.. Concha A, Esteban RJ, Talavera P, Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis caused by Surgical in a renal allograft: Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1997; 12(7); 1509-11, pmid: 9249801

38.. Arnold AC, Sodickson A, Postoperative Surgicel mimicking abscesses following cholecystectomy and liver biopsy: Emerg Radiol, 2008; 15(3); 183-85, pmid: 17899231

39.. Ito H, Onishi H, Shoin K, Nagatani H, Granuloma caused by oxidized cellulose following craniotomy: Acta Neurochir, 1989; 100(1–2); 70-73, pmid: 2816537

40.. Bradley M, Singh G, Case report: An oxidized cellulose granuloma – another hepatic pseudotumour?: Clin Radiol, 1991; 44(3); 206-7, pmid: 1914404

41.. Deger RB, LiVolsi VA, Noumoff JS, Foreign body reaction (gossypiboma) masking as recurrent ovarian cancer: Gynecol Oncol, 1995; 56(1); 94-96, pmid: 7821856

42.. Sandhu GS, Elexpuru-Camiruaga JA, Buckley S, Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) granulomata mimicking tumour recurrence: Br J Neurosurg, 1996; 10(6); 617-19, pmid: 9115663

43.. Iwabuchi S, Koike K, Okabe T, Iatrogenic paraplegia caused by surgicel used for hemostasis during a thoracotomy: Report of a case: Surg Today, 1997; 27(10); 969-70, pmid: 10870587

44.. Banerjee T, Goldschmidt K, ‘Surgiceloma’ manifested as cauda equina syndrome: South Med J, 1998; 91(5); 481-83, pmid: 9598861

45.. Ibrahim MF, Aps C, Young CP, A foreign body reaction to Surgicel mimicking an abscess following cardiac surgery: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002; 22(3); 489-90, pmid: 12204761

46.. Gao HW, Lin CK, Yu CP, Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) granuloma mimicking a primary ovarian tumor: Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2002; 21(4); 422-23, pmid: 12352194

47.. Fariña Pérez LA, Delgado C, Dos Santos J, Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) mimics an abscess after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Actas Urol Esp, 2004; 28(1); 54-56, pmid: 15046482

48.. Salmo E, Bisset R, Aldean I, Oxidized cellulose mimicking a recurrent colorectal cancer: Report of a case and review of the literature: Colorectal Dis, 2010; 12(4); 381-82, pmid: 19220373

49.. Agarwal MM, Mandal AK, Agarwal S, Surgicel granuloma: unusual cause of “recurrent” mass lesion after laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: Urology, 2010; 76(2); 334-35, pmid: 20494418

50.. Tefik T, Sanli O, Oktar T, Oxidized regenerated cellulose granuloma mimicking recurrent mass lesion after laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: Int J Surg Case Rep, 2012; 3(6); 227-30, pmid: 22472162

51.. Wang H, Chen P: Oncol Lett, 2013; 5(5); 1497-500, pmid: 23759739

52.. Behbehani S, Tulandi T, Oxidized regenerated cellulose imitating pelvic abscess: Obstet Gynecol, 2013; 121(2 Pt 2 Suppl. 1); 447-49, pmid: 23344404

53.. Tam T, Harkins G, Dykes T, Oxidized regenerated cellulose resembling vaginal cuff abscess: JSLS, 2014; 18(2); 353-56, pmid: 24960506

54.. Zhang F, Bonidie MJ, Ventrelli SM, Furlan A, Intraovarian oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) mimicking acute ovarian pathology after recent pelvic surgery: Radiol Case Rep, 2015; 10(4); 39-41, pmid: 26649116

55.. Cormio L, Cormio G, Di Fino G: Oncol Lett, 2016; 12(2); 1083-84, pmid: 27446398

56.. Singh A, Jai S, Ganpule S, Ganpule A, Bolster material granuloma masquerading as recurrent renal cell carcinoma following partial nephrectomy: Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2016; 26(3); 352-55, pmid: 27857461

57.. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Saetta A, The SCARE statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines: Int J Surg, 2016; 34; 180-86, pmid: 27613565

In Press

Case report  China

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdev...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976  

Case report  Greece

Multilevel Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Low Back Pain in Achondroplasia: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290  

Case report  Italy

Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607  

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Postoperative Corneal Dellen Following PreserFlo MicroShunt: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Dec 2021 : Case report  USA 17,691,734

Edwardsiella tarda: A Classic Presentation of a Rare Fatal Infection, with Possible New Background Risk Fac...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil 164,491

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

21 Jun 2024 : Case report  China (mainland) 113,090

Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371

0:00

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 59,175

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923