24 December 2018: Articles
Thoracic Damage Control: Let’s Think About Intrathoracic Packing
Management of emergency care
Maud Prezman-Pietri ABCDEF 1, Pierre Rabinel B 2, Grégoire Périé B 2, Bernard Georges ABDE 1, Laurent Brouchet ABEF 2, Fanny Vardon Bounes ABCDEF 1*DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.911097
Am J Case Rep 2018; 19:1526-1529
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In cases of hemorrhagic shock following thoracic trauma, thoracotomy is indicated as primary surgical management, as a chest tube might lead to exsanguination. Thoracic packing is an alternative, particularly in severe injury trauma.
CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old male was involved in an accident in which 2 cars collided. The patient suffered from right-sided hemothorax due to diaphragm rupture and stripping of the diaphragmatic pillar. A right anterolateral thoracotomy revealed an active bleed due to diaphragmatic pillar stripping and laceration with liver herniation. Right thoracic packing was established to stop the bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary objectives of thoracic damage control are to prevent cardiac tamponade, to control intrathoracic bleeding and massive air embolism or bronchopleural fistula, and to allow open cardiac massage. These patients represent challenging cases of both rapid therapeutic decision-making and operative intervention. Thoracic packing is a part of damage control in cases of hemorrhagic shock after thoracic trauma.
Keywords: Hemothorax, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Thoracic Injuries
Background
Thoracic trauma injury is a frequent lesion found in severely traumatized patients, with a fatality rate of 25%. Even minor traumatic hemothorax can be self-renewed by pleural clotting, which can worsen a patient’s condition. In cases of hemodynamic instability, diagnostic and hemostatic thoracotomy are indicated as primary surgical management, as a chest tube might lead to exsanguination. Scientific literature describes goals of damage control for thoracic injury [1–3].
Here, we report the case of a severe thoracic trauma complicated by hemorrhagic shock, successfully treated with thoracic packing.
Case Report
We report the case of a 48-year-old male who was involved in an accident in which 2 cars collided at high speed on a race circuit. Upon arrival of the French Emergency Medical Service, physical examination of the patient revealed 96% oxygen saturation, while the patient was receiving 5 L/minute via an oxygen mask, and the patient was found to be hemodynamic instability. The first micro method-determined hemoglobin was 110 g/L, which decreased to 89 g/L. Ultrasound revealed bilateral pleural effusion. Prehospital care consisted of vascular filling, intravenous norepinephrine infusion, and 2 packed red blood cell transfusions. The patient was intubated before being transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center.
Upon arrival at the trauma center, blood tests revealed hemostasis disorders, combined respiratory and metabolic acidosis, and traumatic coagulopathy. Computed tomography scan showed a massive right-sided hemothorax due to diaphragm rupture (Figures 1, 2) and multiple costal fractures. Mediastinal mass effect also occurred as a complication, with stripping of the diaphragmatic pillar and pulmonary collapse. There was no cerebral or abdominal injury.
Right anterolateral thoracotomy was emergently performed to control stripping diaphragmatic pillar. After hemothorax evacuation, active bleeding due to traumatic diaphragmatic pillar stripping was found. Moreover, a traumatic section of triangular ligament led to active pre-vertebral bleeding. Diaphragmatic laceration with herniation of the liver was found, but no laparotomy was performed. Diaphragmatic crura suturing was not sufficient to stop the bleeding or to correct hemodynamic instability. As damage control treatment, right thoracic packing was performed (Figures 3, 4) with mesh insertion, associated with 2 chest tubes. The patient was stabilized after surgery. The thoracic packing was removed 48 hours later, without bleeding relapse. Chest tubes were removed 3 days later. The patient was finally extubated at day 5. He left the intensive care unit at day 12, and went back home 18 days after the accident.
Discussion
Despite a high mortality rate, about 90% of patients with life-threatening thoracic injuries are managed with a simple procedure such as pleural drainage using a chest tube [1].
In 1970, McNamara and colleagues described a reduction in mortality rates when thoracotomy was performed “early” after penetrating trauma [4]. This report defines criteria for surgical exploration: initial chest tube output exceeding 1500 milliliters or continuous hourly output of more than 200 mL per hour [5–8]. Recently, new recommendations regarding the management of severe trauma injury have been proposed [9].
Thoracic damage control should be used whenever the magnitude of the visceral damage is such that definitive repair is likely to exceed the patient’s physiologic limits [1,10]. The concept is to focus on stopping the hemorrhage alone and not to address definitive repair or closure. Resuscitative thoracotomy is restricted to patients with specific indications as determined by the patient’s clinical status immediately upon arrival to the emergency department, the mechanism of injury, or the need to perform therapeutic maneuvers to manage correctable causes of shock, including decompressing cardiac tamponade, cross-clamping the aorta, managing exsanguinating cardiac or vascular injuries, and evacuating air embolisms.
The primary objectives of thoracic damage control are to prevent cardiac tamponade, to control intrathoracic bleeding, to control massive air embolism or bronchopleural fistula, and to allow open cardiac massage [3,4,6]. Although only 10% of blunt chest trauma requires an operation, these patients typically present a challenging treatment dilemma, including rapid but thoughtful decision-making, comprehensive anatomic understanding, and often prompt operative intervention [6].
Many thoracic surgeons avoid damage-control techniques such as intrathoracic packing and temporary chest wall closure after thoracotomy for trauma because of the potential effect of packing on intrathoracic pressure and infection risks [11]. Patients can develop a thoracic compartment syndrome, which is physiopathology similar to cardiac tamponade. Venous return can be decreased by high intrathoracic pressure, and hypovolemia patients exacerbate this mechanism leading to decreased cardiac output. In a retrospective trauma registry study of 42 patients with thoracic packing, only 1 develop thoracic compartment syndrome [12]. There was no difference in mean airway pressure before or after chest closure. Thus, thoracic compartment with ventilation and cardiac impairment can stay thoracic complications. However, to not compromise cardiac function, it has to be integrated inside the lateral, posterior, and apical thoracic recess without disturbing heart function or inferior vena cava [13,14]. In our case report, cardiac and ventilator functions were not compromised by thoracic packing, and bleeding control improve hemodynamics.
A retrospective study of 12 traumatized patients identified hemostasis control in 7 patients treated by pleural packing [15]. Complications included acute renal failure, bacteremia, pneumonia, and adult respiratory distress syndrome. However, it is worth noting that no study has shown an increase in mortality, or an increase in infections associated with pleural packing.
A “second-look” surgery is generally recommended within 48 hours, but timing for return to the operating room for definitive chest closure is determined by adequacy of resuscitation.
Conclusions
Thoracic packing can be an alternative to manage uncontrollable chest wall bleeding post-trauma, permitting successful hemostasis and cardio-respiratory stability. This technique should be developed as damage-control surgery practice.
References:
1.. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Blunt chest trauma: Curr Probl Surgery, 2004; 41(3); 211-380
2.. Wall MJ, Soltero E, Damage control for thoracic injuries: Surg Clin North Am, 1997; 77(4); 863-78, pmid: 9291987
3.. Pérez-Alonso D, Santana-Rodríguez N, Cano JR, Selective packing for uncontrollable traumatic thoracic wall bleeding preserving cardiopulmonary function: Am J Surg, 2017; 214(3); 413-15, pmid: 28027723
4.. Mackowski MJ, Barnett RE, Harbrecht BG, Damage control for thoracic trauma: Am Surg, 2014; 80(9); 910-13, pmid: 25197880
5.. McNamara JJ, Messersmith JK, Dunn RA, Thoracic injuries in combat casualties in Vietnam: Ann Thorac Surg, 1970; 10(5); 389-401, pmid: 5476227
6.. Meredith JW, Hott JJ, Thoracic trauma: When and how to intervene: Surg Clin North Am, 2007; 87(1); 95-118, pmid: 17127125
7.. Kish G, Kozloff L, Joseph WL, Adkins PC, Indications for early thoracotomy in the management of chest trauma: Ann Thorac Surg, 1976; 22(1); 23-28, pmid: 938133
8.. , Committee on Trauma: Practice management guidelines for emergency department thoracotomy: J Am Coll Surg, 2001; 193(3); 303-9, pmid: 11548801
9.. Bouzat P, Raux M, David JS, Chest trauma: First 48 hours management: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2017; 36(2); 135-45, pmid: 28096063
10.. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Timing for urgent thoracotomy for hemorrhage after trauma: A multicenter study: Arch Surg, 2001; 136(5); 513-18, pmid: 11343541
11.. Shapiro MB, Jenkins DH, Schwab CW, Rotondo MF, Damage control: Collective review: J Trauma, 2000; 49(5); 969-78, pmid: 11086798
12.. O’Connor JV, DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Damage control thoracic surgery: Management and outcomes: J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014; 77(5); 660-65, pmid: 25494414
13.. Moriwaki Y, Toyoda H, Harunari N, Gauze packing as damage control for uncontrollable haemorrhage in severe thoracic trauma: Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2013; 95(1); 20-25, pmid: 23317720
14.. Phelan HA, Patterson SG, Hassan MO, Thoracic damage-control operation: Principles, techniques, and definitive repair: J Am Coll Surg, 2006; 203(6); 933-41, pmid: 17116562
15.. Lang JL, Gonzalez RP, Aldy KN, Does temporary chest wall closure with or without chest packing improve survival for trauma patients in shock after emergent thoracotomy?: J Trauma, 2011; 70; 705-9, pmid: 21610362
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






