15 May 2025: Case Reports
Atorvastatin-Associated Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report
Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Adverse events of drug therapy, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis), Rare coexistence of disease or pathology
Fahad Alshammari BDEF 1*, Alwaleed Alharbi ADF 1, Reem Ali Alshammari BE 2DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945772
Am J Case Rep 2025; 26:e945772
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) occurs when pancreatic enzymes activate within the pancreas, causing damage. In the USA, 210 000 patients are hospitalized annually due to AP. Although statin-induced pancreatitis is rare and often misdiagnosed, it is crucial to investigate, as avoiding the causative medication can prevent attacks. There is conflicting evidence, and further research is needed to determine if statins increase the risk of AP.
CASE REPORT: In this report, we detail the case of a 48-year-old man with a history of dyslipidemia, for which he was prescribed atorvastatin 40 mg/day as a lipid-lowering agent. He developed acute pancreatitis after using atorvastatin. He initially presented to the emergency room with worsening epigastric pain. Elevated levels of lipase, amylase, and alanine aminotransferases in laboratory tests indicated acute pancreatitis. Given these findings, supportive care was promptly initiated, and atorvastatin, identified as the potential trigger, was discontinued. Notably, the patient had no history of alcohol or tobacco use, and extensive diagnostic efforts ruled out other common causes of acute pancreatitis. The absence of other risk factors reinforced the likelihood that atorvastatin was responsible for his condition, as noted in Table 2. This case underscores the importance of careful monitoring of symptoms and laboratory findings in patients treated with statin medications, particularly when prescribed for dyslipidemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Documenting such unusual cases could help highlight the potential risks of acute pancreatitis associated with statin use.
Keywords: dyslipidemias, Cardiology, pancreatitis, atorvastatin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Acute Disease
Introduction
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe inflammatory condition caused by the premature activation of digestive enzymes within the pancreas, leading to autodigestion and tissue inflammation [1]. It is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal hospitalizations in the United States, with an incidence of approximately 210 000 cases annually [2]. The clinical presentation of AP varies widely, ranging from mild inflammation to severe necrotizing pancreatitis associated with systemic organ failure and high mortality rates [1]. The most common causes of AP include gallstones, alcohol consumption, and hypertriglyceridemia. However, drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP) is a rare cause, accounting for less than 2% of cases [3].
From 2015 to 2017, 17 730 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in Saudi Arabia, with 11.11% being cardiovascular-related. Atorvastatin accounted for 9.7% of these ADRs, including muscle pain, fatigue, elevated liver enzymes, and increased bilirubin [4].
Statins, commonly used for hyperlipidemia, lower serum cholesterol and cardiovascular risk by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. In 2018–2019, approximately 92 million individuals in the United States used statins [5,6]. The association between statin use and AP remains controversial, requiring further research to establish causality [7,8].
Case Report
INVESTIGATIONS:
The patient underwent a series of diagnostic investigations to determine the cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) and exclude other potential etiologies. An abdominal ultrasound of the liver and biliary tract revealed mild gallbladder wall thickening measuring up to 5.5 mm, which was likely reactive, without evidence of gallstones or pericholecystic fluid. The common bile duct (CBD) was non-dilated, and no biliary dilatation was observed. Laboratory investigations revealed significantly elevated pancreatic enzymes, with amylase at 3273 U/L and lipase at 2503 U/L, consistent with the diagnosis of AP. Liver function tests showed mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at 113 U/L and total bilirubin at 45.8 μmol/L, while alkaline phosphatase and creatinine levels were within normal limits. A lipid profile ruled out hypertriglyceridemia as a cause. Table 1 summarizes the laboratory findings.
TREATMENT AND OUTCOME:
Initial management consisted of supportive care, including hydration with lactated Ringer’s solution at 125 mL/hour and symptomatic treatment with metoclopramide for nausea and paracetamol for analgesia. Atorvastatin was promptly discontinued. The patient was maintained on a low-fat diet and closely monitored for symptom resolution.
During a 2-day hospital stay, pancreatic enzyme levels decreased significantly (lipase: 1147 U/L, amylase: 1733 U/L), and the patient’s abdominal pain improved. He was discharged with prescriptions for paracetamol for residual pain and pantoprazole 40 mg for gastroprotection. At follow-up, he reported complete resolution of symptoms, with no recurrence of AP.
Discussion
A 48-year-old man developed acute pancreatitis (AP) following atorvastatin use, with a Naranjo scale score of 6 (Table 2), indicating a probable adverse drug reaction [9]. The Naranjo scale has been widely utilized in epidemiological studies to assess the probability of adverse drug reactions in AP. For example, a study by Jones et al showed its utility in systematically identifying drug-induced AP cases, ensuring objective and reproducible assessments [1]. This supports its reliability in our case, where atorvastatin was identified as the probable causative agent.
Dyslipidemia, the condition for which the patient was prescribed atorvastatin, is known to be associated with hypertriglyceridemia, a recognized independent risk factor for AP. However, the patient’s triglyceride levels were within normal limits at the time of admission, ruling out hypertriglyceridemia as a potential contributor. This finding reinforces the likelihood that atorvastatin itself was the causative agent in this case.
A literature review reveals that statin-induced AP is not limited to atorvastatin; similar cases involving simvastatin and pravastatin show symptom resolution upon discontinuation, supporting a potential class effect of statins in inducing AP [3,5]. Our case report contributes to this evidence by demonstrating a clear temporal relationship between atorvastatin use and AP onset, along with rigorous exclusion of other etiologies, providing a strong model for diagnosing statin-induced AP.
Our approach emphasizes thorough clinical evaluation and detailed drug history for diagnosing medication-induced AP. Serum lipase and amylase levels rise to at least twice the normal limit upon admission, with lipase, which is more specific than amylase, declining over 7–14 days [8]. Timely intervention with supportive care, including analgesics and hydration, is essential to manage this severe adverse drug reaction [10].
Statins are part of a broader spectrum of medications linked to AP, including azathioprine, hydrochlorothiazide, and metronidazole [11]. According to the Badalov classification system, which ranks drugs inducing AP based on reported cases, re-challenge outcomes, and latency periods, statins are classified as class 3b or 4 [12]. This underscores the need for vigilance and proactive management in patients on statins presenting with unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms.
Conclusions
It is imperative that clinicians become more familiar with statins as a probable cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) and maintain a high index of suspicion in such cases, especially when patients present with AP of unknown etiology. A comprehensive review of the patient’s medication history is essential for identifying any potential links between statin use and the onset of AP symptoms. Furthermore, there is a clear need for prospective studies with large sample sizes to elucidate the exact relationship between statin use and the induction of AP. Such studies will provide deeper insights into the mechanisms by which statins may cause this serious adverse effect and guide the development of more effective management strategies to mitigate risks associated with statin therapy.
References
1. Jones MR, Hall OM, Kaye AM, Kaye AD, Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: A review: Ochsner J, 2015; 15(1); 45-51
2. Russo MW, Wei JT, Thiny MT, Digestive and liver diseases statistics, 2004: Gastroenterology, 2004; 126(5); 1448-53
3. Tarar ZI, Zafar MU, Ghous G, Pravastatin-induced acute pancreatitis: A case report and literature review: J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep, 2021; 9; 23247096211028386
4. Bin Yousef N, Yenugadhati N, Alqahtani N, Patterns of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Saudi Arabia: Saudi Pharm J, 2022; 30(1); 8-13
5. Johnson JL, Loomis IB, A case of simvastatin-associated pancreatitis and review of statin-associated pancreatitis: Pharmacotherapy, 2006; 26(3); 414-22
6. Matyori A, Brown CP, Ali A, Sherbeny F, Statins utilization trends and expenditures in the U.S. before and after the implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines: Saudi Pharm J, 2023; 31(6); 795-800
7. O’Connor CE, Dang BQ, Miles B, Statin therapy and pancreatitis: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis: Cureus, 2024; 16(1); e51723
8. Chintanaboina J, Gopavaram D, Recurrent acute pancreatitis probably induced by rosuvastatin therapy: A case report: Case Rep Med, 2012; 2012; 973279
9. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1981; 30(2); 239-45
10. Almohammadi AA, Aljafri OH, Esawi HH, The etiology and epidemiological features of acute pancreatitis in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review: Cureus, 2023; 15(10); e46511
11. Tsigrelis C, Pitchumoni CS, Pravastatin: A potential cause for acute pancreatitis: World J Gastroenterol, 2006; 12(43); 7055-57
12. Saini J, Marino D, Badalov N, Vugelman M, Tenner S, Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based classification (revised): Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2023; 14(8); e00621
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133








![Naranjo scale showing score in this case [9].](https://jours.isi-science.com/imageXml.php?i=t2-amjcaserep-26-e945772.jpg&idArt=945772&w=1000)