20 February 2026: Articles
Early-Onset Ocular Presentation in Stickler Syndrome Type 1 Due to a COL2A1 Frameshift Variant
Challenging differential diagnosis, Management of emergency care, Rare disease, Congenital defects / diseases
Faisal Al-Qahtani ADE 1, Motazz A. Alarfaj ABCDEF 2*, Abdulelah Al-Abdullah ADE 3DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.951257
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e951257
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stickler syndrome is a genetically heterogeneous connective tissue disorder caused by mutations in collagen genes (COL2A1, COL11A1, COL11A2, COL9A1, and COL9A2). It is characterized by a distinctive craniofacial appearance, high myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration, hearing loss, and early-onset arthritis. Type 1, the most common autosomal-dominant form, results from COL2A1 variants and is strongly associated with ocular complications, including high myopia, vitreous degeneration, and retinal detachment. Early recognition of systemic and ocular findings is essential for timely management and genetic counseling.
CASE REPORT: An 8-year-old Saudi girl presented to the emergency department with sudden deterioration of vision in the right eye. External examination revealed midfacial hypoplasia. Ophthalmologic evaluations, including best-corrected visual acuity measurement, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and genetic testing, were performed. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was identified and surgically managed. Revision surgery was performed; at 3 years post-revision, best-corrected visual acuity in the right eye had improved to 20/30. The family history included childhood retinal detachment in the patient’s father. Clinical exome sequencing identified a novel heterozygous COL2A1 frameshift variant, c.3642delT (p.Gly1215Alafs*12), that introduced a premature stop codon; Sanger sequencing confirmation and segregation analysis were consistent with pathogenicity.
CONCLUSIONS: This report describes a previously undocumented COL2A1 frameshift variant causing Stickler syndrome type 1. The truncating mutation may be associated with the early-onset, ocular-predominant presentation observed in the present case. This variant expands the known COL2A1 mutational spectrum and underscores the importance of molecular testing for accurate diagnosis and family counseling in pediatric collagenopathies.
Keywords: Case Reports, Genetics, Mutation, Retinal Detachment, Syndrome
Introduction
Stickler syndrome, also known as hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmodystrophy, is a very common inherited connective tissue disorder, with an estimated incidence of 1: 7500 live births. It is also the leading cause of inherited retinal detachment in childhood [1,2]. The disorder involves pathogenic variants in type II, IX, or XI collagen and is characterized by a distinctive craniofacial appearance, high myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration, hearing loss, and early-onset arthritis.
Stickler syndrome is genetically heterogeneous and classified into 4 principal subtypes according to the underlying gene defect. Type 1, the most common autosomal dominant form, is associated with mutations in
In the differential diagnosis of pediatric vitreoretinal degeneration with early retinal detachment, conditions such as Wagner syndrome and Knobloch syndrome may mimic Stickler syndrome but typically differ in vitreous morphology and systemic associations. Wagner syndrome is characterized by an optically empty vitreous with avascular vitreous veils, high myopia, presenile cataract, and night-vision manifestations secondary to progressive chorioretinal atrophy, in the absence of systemic abnormalities. Knobloch syndrome is characterized by severe high myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration, macular chorioretinal atrophy, smooth cryptless irides, cataract, and glaucoma, with the hallmark finding of an occipital skull encephalocele [1,9]. Clinically, Stickler and Marshall syndromes share overlapping craniofacial and auditory features because both may involve
Case Report
An 8-year-old Saudi girl presented to the ophthalmic emergency department with a 2-day history of sudden vision loss in the right eye. High myopia was present, with refractive errors of −17.00 diopters in the right eye and −15.00 diopters in the left eye. No prior history of ocular trauma, flashes, floaters, or retinal detachment was reported. General health was unremarkable, and academic performance was appropriate for age. Craniofacial examination revealed midfacial hypoplasia; no cleft palate, uvular anomaly, or clinically evident micrognathia was observed. No joint complaints or auditory symptoms were reported; however, formal audiologic evaluation, rheumatologic assessment, and range-of-motion or hyperextensibility testing were not performed. Anthropometric measurements (height, weight, arm span, and sitting-height ratio) and detailed dysmorphologic assessment findings (orbital configuration, nasal morphology, mandibular position, and auricular morphology) were not recorded. Skeletal radiographs to assess spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, karyotype analysis, and echocardiography were not obtained. The patient was born to nonconsanguineous parents and had 3 sisters, all with high myopia. Her father, who had short stature and a flat midface, reported a history of retinal detachment that had been surgically repaired during childhood (Figure 1).
Ophthalmic examination demonstrated best-corrected visual acuities of 20/80 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Intraocular pressures were within normal limits in both eyes. The anterior segment was unremarkable, except for pigmented cells (Shafer’s sign) in the anterior vitreous and anterior chamber of the right eye. The vitreous exhibited a membranous, sheet-like configuration with beaded folds, reflecting the classic type 1–related vitreous phenotype. Dilated fundus examination revealed inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment caused by a round inferior retinal break in the right eye, with partial macular involvement (Figure 2). Posterior vitreous detachment was absent. The left eye demonstrated myopic fundus changes with peripheral retinal holes.
The following day, the patient underwent chandelier-assisted scleral buckle (SB) surgery with cryotherapy. This approach was selected because the retinal detachment was relatively shallow, originated inferiorly from a single round atrophic hole, and was associated with neither vitreoretinal traction nor posterior vitreous detachment. These features favored external support while minimizing intraocular manipulation and preserving the crystalline lens in an 8-year-old patient. A recent comparative study of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), SB, and combined PPV–SB in syndromes with an optically empty vitreous demonstrated that primary SB was associated with superior visual acuity and anatomic outcomes [4]. The use of chandelier illumination, based on surgeon preference, provided enhanced visualization of the peripheral retina during the procedure [14]. Two peripheral retinal holes at the 7 o’clock position were treated with cryopexy. A #240 encircling band was placed beneath the rectus muscles; a #70 sleeve was positioned in the inferotemporal quadrant to support the inferior break. The buckle was secured with 5-0 Mersilene sutures. After tightening, optic disc pulsations were observed, and anterior chamber paracentesis was performed. Prophylactic laser photocoagulation was applied to the fellow eye.
At the 4-month follow-up, recurrent inferior retinal detachment was detected intraoperatively. The SB was encapsulated, and the encircling band had shifted anteriorly, leaving the inferior break unsupported. These findings were consistent with mechanical underindentation, rather than proliferative vitreoretinopathy, as the cause of failure. Revision surgery was performed, during which cryopexy was reapplied and a #506 sponge was sutured posteriorly to the sclera at the site of the break to provide additional support. After revision, the retina remained attached. At the final follow-up, 3 years post-revision, best-corrected visual acuity in the right eye had improved to 20/30.
Given the strong family history and clinical features, Stickler syndrome was suspected. Clinical whole-exome sequencing (Bioscientia) – using an exome capture method that targeted more than 20 000 protein-coding genes – identified a heterozygous
Discussion
Only a limited number of studies have reported treatment outcomes in patients with Stickler syndrome involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Al Rashaed et al reported a primary reattachment success rate of 60% following scleral buckling, which increased to 93% after a second procedure; visual acuity improvement was observed in 54% of eyes [16]. Similarly, in the present case, complete retinal reattachment was achieved after a second SB procedure, with a final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30. In our case, the decision to perform chandelier-assisted scleral buckling (rather than PPV) was guided by several anatomic and clinical factors. The retinal detachment was relatively shallow, originated from a single inferior round atrophic hole without vitreoretinal traction, and occurred in the absence of posterior vitreous detachment. These features indicated that an external support procedure would be sufficient to achieve retinal reattachment while avoiding unnecessary intraocular intervention. PPV in pediatric patients with Stickler syndrome is linked to additional concerns, including increased risks of lens injury, accelerated cataract formation, iatrogenic retinal breaks, and postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The use of silicone oil may introduce further complications, such as emulsification, secondary glaucoma, and keratopathy. The chandelier-assisted technique, selected based on surgeon preference, provided enhanced intraoperative visualization of the retinal periphery and improved surgical ergonomics. A recent comparative study evaluating primary scleral buckling, PPV, and combined PPV–SB for retinal detachment in syndromes characterized by an optically empty vitreous demonstrated that initial scleral buckling achieved anatomic and visual outcomes superior to those of PPV alone or the combined approach [4]. The presence of high myopia and a strong family history of retinal detachment further supported the diagnosis of Stickler syndrome. Although recognizable craniofacial features were present in this patient, diagnosis may be challenging in cases where such findings are absent. Huang et al described 2 novel
Genetic studies indicate that approximately 10% of pathogenic variants are missense mutations within the triple-helical domain, some of which retain partial function, such as arginine-to-cysteine substitutions. Vitreoretinal complications, including retinal tears and retinal detachment, are observed more frequently in patients harboring
Conclusions
The identification of a novel
Figures
Figure 1. Family pedigree and segregation analysis. Squares indicate male relatives, circles indicate female relatives, and the arrow denotes the proband. Colored sectors indicate clinical features (red, history of retinal detachment; blue, high myopia only). Roman numerals (I–III) denote generations. Targeted Sanger sequencing for COL2A1 c.3642delT (p.Gly1215Alafs*12) demonstrated that the father is heterozygous (positive) and the mother is negative; siblings were not tested. The inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant with variable expressivity, and the variant segregates with disease in the family.
Figure 2. (A) Wide-field pseudocolor fundus photograph of the right eye showing a myopic fundus with inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (white star) involving the inferior outer macula. (B) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the macula demonstrating sparing of the fovea (asterisk) from the retinal detachment.
Figure 3. (A) Summary table of clinical genetic findings. (B) cDNA schematic illustrating c.3642delT (red) in exon 51, which results in a frameshift and premature termination codon, consistent with loss of function via predicted nonsense-mediated decay. References
1. Snead MP, Yates JR, Clinical and molecular genetics of Stickler syndrome: J Med Genet, 1999; 36(5); 353-59
2. Carroll C, Papaioannou D, Rees A, Kaltenthaler E, The clinical effectiveness and safety of prophylactic retinal interventions to reduce the risk of retinal detachment and subsequent vision loss in adults and children with Stickler syndrome: A systematic review: Health Technol Assess, 2011; 15(16); iii-xiv
3. Ahmad NN, Ala-Kokko L, Knowlton RG: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991; 88(15); 6624-27
4. Taylor K, Su M, Richards Z, Outcomes in retinal detachment repair and laser prophylaxis for syndromes with optically empty vitreous: Ophthalmol Retina, 2023; 7(10); 756-64
5. Francomano CA, Liberfarb RM, Hirose T, The Stickler syndrome: Evidence for close linkage to the structural gene for type II collagen: Genomics, 1987; 1(4); 293-96
6. Stickler GB, Hughes W, Houchin P, Clinical features of hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy (Stickler syndrome): A survey: Genet Med, 2001; 3(3); 192-96
7. Hoornaert K, Vereecke I, Dewinter C: Eur J Hum Genet, 2010; 18(12); 1261-71
8. Snead MP, McNinch AM, Poulson AV, Stickler syndrome, ocular-only variants and a key diagnostic role for the ophthalmologist: Eye (Lond), 2011; 25(11); 1389-400
9. Parma ES, Korkko J, Hagler WS, Ala-Kokko L, Radial perivascular retinal degeneration: A key to the clinical diagnosis of an ocular variant of Stickler syndrome with minimal or no systemic manifestations: Am J Ophthalmol, 2002; 134(5); 728-34
10. Abeysiri P, Bunce C, da Cruz L, Outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment in patients with Stickler syndrome: A comparison of two sequential 20-year cohorts: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2007; 245(11); 1633-38
11. Boothe MM, Morris R, Robin NH, Stickler syndrome: A review of clinical manifestations and the genetics evaluation: J Pers Med, 2020; 10(3); 105
12. Alexander P, Snead MP, Prevention of blindness in Stickler syndrome: Genes (Basel), 2022; 13(7); 1150
13. Khanna S, Rodriguez SH, Blair MA, Laser prophylaxis in patients with Stickler syndrome: Ophthalmol Retina, 2022; 6(4); 263-67
14. Yokoyama T, Kanbayashi K, Yamaguchi T, Scleral buckling procedure with chandelier illumination for pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Clin Ophthalmol, 2015; 9; 169-73
15. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology: Genet Med, 2015; 17(5); 405-24
16. Al Rashaed S, Alshahrani S, Ghazi N, Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments associated with Stickler syndrome in a tertiary eye care center in Saudi Arabia: Clin Ophthalmol, 2015; 9; 1239-44
17. Huang X, Lin Y, Chen C: Int J Mol Med, 2018; 42(4); 1819-26
18. Jacobson A, Besirli CG, Bohnsack BL, Characteristics of a three-generation family with Stickler syndrome: Genes (Basel), 2023; 14(4); 847
Figures
Figure 1. Family pedigree and segregation analysis. Squares indicate male relatives, circles indicate female relatives, and the arrow denotes the proband. Colored sectors indicate clinical features (red, history of retinal detachment; blue, high myopia only). Roman numerals (I–III) denote generations. Targeted Sanger sequencing for COL2A1 c.3642delT (p.Gly1215Alafs*12) demonstrated that the father is heterozygous (positive) and the mother is negative; siblings were not tested. The inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant with variable expressivity, and the variant segregates with disease in the family.
Figure 2. (A) Wide-field pseudocolor fundus photograph of the right eye showing a myopic fundus with inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (white star) involving the inferior outer macula. (B) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the macula demonstrating sparing of the fovea (asterisk) from the retinal detachment.
Figure 3. (A) Summary table of clinical genetic findings. (B) cDNA schematic illustrating c.3642delT (red) in exon 51, which results in a frameshift and premature termination codon, consistent with loss of function via predicted nonsense-mediated decay. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






