19 April 2026: Articles
Intramuscular Cavernous Hemangioma of the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle: A Rare Presentation of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain – Case Report
Challenging differential diagnosis, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Zhuang-Ying Lee EF 1, Terence Ming Kwan Chin EF 1, Kin-Fah Chin BE 1,2*, Julia Munchar Jajuli CDE 3,4, Keh Oon Ong CDE 5DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952352
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952352
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemangiomas comprise 7% of benign soft tissue tumors, and only 0.8% of hemangiomas are intramuscular; 26% of intramuscular hemangiomas comprise the cavernous histologic variant. Intramuscular cavernous hemangiomas are benign soft tissue tumors of unknown pathophysiology. They are most commonly described in the extremities, with few reports involving the thorax.
CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old Chinese woman – previously healthy with no clinically significant comorbidities – presented with a chronic, painful swelling of the right lateral chest wall. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lobulated, patchy enhancing lesion measuring 2.4×1.2×2.3 cm within the right latissimus dorsi muscle. Radiologic and clinical findings were inconclusive; after a period of observation and serial imaging, the lesion was surgically resected. Histopathologic examination of the specimen confirmed a cavernous hemangioma. The patient had an uneventful recovery and a favorable postoperative outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the need to consider intramuscular hemangioma in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging modality of choice for lesion characterization; however, histopathologic analysis is often required for definitive diagnosis. Surgical management yields favorable outcomes in patients with cavernous hemangiomas; nevertheless, clinical and radiologic follow-up is recommended due to the risk of recurrence. Medical imaging may be useful in guiding preoperative and intraoperative lesion localization.
Keywords: Case Reports, Hemangioma, Cavernous, Muscle, Skeletal
Introduction
Intramuscular cavernous hemangiomas are rare, benign tumors of unknown pathogenesis. Comprising 0.8% of all hemangiomas [1–4], they pose a diagnostic challenge, partly due to the lack of specific clinical findings. They are most commonly described as affecting the extremities, with few reports involving the thorax [5,6]. A search of PubMed and Scopus (January 2, 2026; keywords “intramuscular AND cavernous hemangioma AND thorax”) identified 2 reported cases, excluding intercostal intramuscular lesions and lesions of the mediastinum [6,7]. Here, we report a case of intramuscular cavernous hemangioma of the latissimus dorsi muscle in a 53-year-old woman with a 2-year history of a painful, progressively enlarging swelling on the right lateral chest wall. The lesion was surgically resected, with a favorable postoperative outcome.
Case Report
A 53-year-old Chinese woman – previously healthy with no clinically significant comorbidities – presented with a mass on the right lateral chest wall that had caused intermittent discomfort and pain during physical activity. The discomfort was controlled with simple analgesics as needed. On examination, a soft, round mass measuring approximately 2×2 cm was palpated along the right mid-axillary line. The lesion was difficult to sufficiently delineate for clinical assessment because it was located deep within the latissimus dorsi muscle. Differential diagnoses included lipoma, hemangioma, and neurofibroma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a lobulated, patchy enhancing lesion measuring 2.4×1.2×2.3 cm within the right latissimus dorsi muscle, abutting the underlying ribs (Figure 1).
Over the same 2-year period as her symptoms, the patient underwent follow-up with musculoskeletal ultrasonography every 3 to 6 months. Interval scans demonstrated progressive enlargement of the lesion to 2.9×0.8×3.0 cm. Figure 2 shows a representative examination from this follow-up period, demonstrating a lobulated hypoechoic lesion that measured 2.7×1.1×2.7 cm. She developed worsening symptoms, including increasing pain and numbness radiating down the right arm; escalating analgesic use was required. Therefore, a decision was made to proceed with surgical excision of the lesion.
We anticipated challenges in localizing the lesion under general anesthesia; therefore, the patient underwent ultrasound-guided preoperative lesion marking. Intraoperatively, a transverse incision was made over the lesion. However, the mass was not palpable after exposure of the latissimus dorsi muscle. An intraoperative ultrasound scan localized the lesion, but it remained impalpable during surgical dissection and exploration. Ultimately, the lesion was secured with an Allis clamp under ultrasound guidance, and a wide local excision was performed.
Histopathologic examination revealed brownish tissue measuring 2.0×1.0×0.5 cm after fixation, composed of lobulated channels of dilated blood vessels lined by flattened endothelial cells, with areas of smooth muscle within adipose tissue and striated muscle bundles (Figure 3). These findings were consistent with a cavernous hemangioma. Postoperatively, the patient remained well and asymptomatic; the wound healed uneventfully.
Discussion
Hemangiomas – localized, benign soft tissue tumors composed of blood-filled vessels – are often congenital [4] and many undergo spontaneous involution [5]. Proliferation later in life may result in pain secondary to local mass effect. The pathogenesis underlying this proliferation remains unclear; trauma, chronic liver disease, and hormonal changes have been proposed as contributing factors [1,6,8,9].
Hemangiomas comprise 7% of benign soft tissue tumors and can occur in any part of the body; clinical presentation varies according to location [10]. The prevalence is higher in women, with a male-to-female ratio of 1: 3 [11]. Histologic variants include arteriovenous, venous, capillary, pyogenic, cavernous, and mixed types [1,2,5,9,11,12]. Only 0.8% of hemangiomas are intramuscular [1–4,12], and 26% of these comprise the cavernous histologic variant [1]; thus, intramuscular cavernous hemangiomas are exceptionally rare.
Cavernous hemangiomas are hamartomatous lesions that arise from mesodermal remnants. They consist of large, dilated blood vessels and contain blood-filled spaces resulting from dilation and thickening of capillary loop walls [10]. These lesions are infiltrative, frequently involve deep structures, and do not spontaneously regress; therefore, they may cause local destruction via pressure on surrounding tissues [13]. Patients with intramuscular cavernous hemangiomas commonly present with a painful, enlarging mass [1,8,12,13]. Clinical assessments reveal a lesion that is often soft and mobile; it lacks the vascular signs characteristic of superficial hemangiomas, such as overlying skin discoloration, pulsation, or bruit [1,4].
Radiography is commonly used to aid in the evaluation and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Ultrasonography is noninvasive, nonionizing, relatively cost-effective, and widely available; therefore, it is generally the preferred initial imaging modality [3]. Hemangiomas appear hypoechoic on ultrasonography. In the presence of calcified thrombi, known as phleboliths (15–30% of cases), acoustic shadowing may be observed [1,6,8,9,12,13]. On contrast-enhanced computed tomography, a hemangioma appears as a heterogeneous, low-attenuation mass due to its vascular, fatty, and stromal components. Phleboliths may also be identified on contrast-enhanced computed tomography [5,9,10]. Although computed tomography may help to evaluate anatomic relationships, MRI is the gold standard for evaluation and characterization of soft tissue lesions. On T1-weighted imaging, hemangiomas are typically hypointense or isointense relative to muscle; on T2-weighted imaging, they appear hyperintense due to high fluid content [1,3,10,12]. In our patient, incidental hepatic hemangiomas were identified on MRI. The coexistence of intramuscular and hepatic hemangiomas may suggest syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau disease or PHACE syndrome. Further genetic evaluation was not pursued in the present case because the patient did not exhibit additional systemic features (eg, cutaneous lesions, visual disturbances, headache, or imbalance). Moreover, such syndromes are more commonly diagnosed in childhood, rather than adulthood.
Histopathology is the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis and determining the grade of soft tissue tumors [3,14]. On histologic examination, hemangiomas are characteristically well-defined, unencapsulated lesions composed of endothelial-lined vascular channels separated by connective tissue stroma [1,2,5].
Management options include observation, medical therapy, or surgery. Medical treatments include intralesional corticosteroids (triamcinolone), immunomodulators (interferon), chemotherapy (vincristine), and beta-blockers (propranolol). Surgical options include excision, embolization, and laser therapy [9,11,14]. The feasibility of surgical intervention depends on patient factors (eg, demographics, comorbidities, cosmetic considerations), lesion characteristics (eg, growth rate, depth of invasion, potential for malignancy), and surgical expertise [1,14]. Surgical management is the most commonly utilized treatment modality, and complete excision with clear margins offers the most favorable outcomes [4,6,14].
Local recurrence of intramuscular hemangiomas occurs in around 18% to 20% of cases and is primarily associated with incomplete resection [1,5–8,14]. Recurrence rates vary among histologic variants; a rate of approximately 20% is reported for the cavernous subtype [1]. Malignant transformation of hemangiomas is rare [4,5,9,12,14].
Conclusions
As a general clinical consideration, a lesion with fluctuating consistency may suggest a vascular origin. Our case highlights the importance of considering intramuscular hemangioma in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with chronic musculoskeletal pain. MRI remains the imaging modality of choice for lesion characterization, although histopathologic analysis is often required to confirm the diagnosis. When conservative management fails, wide surgical excision can yield favorable outcomes. Surgeons may consider ultrasonography for preoperative and intraoperative lesion localization. Clinical and radiologic follow-up is recommended due to the risk of recurrence. Finally, given the potential association of hemangiomas with underlying syndromes, clinicians should perform a comprehensive systemic review and thorough physical examination, including assessment for cutaneous lesions and additional intramuscular hemangiomas. Imaging evaluation should be guided by the patient’s clinical presentation.
Figures
Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging scans: (A) axial short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence; (B) coronal STIR sequence; (C) axial T1-weighted fat-saturated (T1FS) postcontrast image; and (D) sagittal T1FS postcontrast image, showing a lobulated, patchy enhancing lesion (2.4×1.2×2.3 cm) in the right latissimus dorsi muscle abutting the underlying ribs. There was no edema or enhancement of the adjacent muscles or ribs. Three lobulated, patchy enhancing hepatic lesions measuring up to 2.4×2.4×2.0 cm were also identified, suggestive of incidental hepatic hemangiomas. Red arrows denote the lesion of interest.
Figure 2. Ultrasonography images (A, B) showing a lobulated hypoechoic lesion in the right latissimus dorsi muscle abutting the underlying ribs, measuring 2.7×1.1×2.7 cm. Red arrows denote the lesion of interest.
Figure 3. (A) Photomicrograph showing dilated, thin-walled vascular channels between skeletal muscle bundles, with areas of hemorrhage and congestion (hematoxylin and eosin, ×100), as indicated by the black arrow. (B) Photomicrograph demonstrating plump endothelial-lined capillaries between skeletal muscle bundles (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200), as indicated by black arrows. Scale bar represents 500 μm. References
1. Alqahtani AA, AlQarni AA, Abbas MM, Alkhani AM, Temporal muscle cavernous hemangioma: A case report and literature review: Cureus, 2022; 14(3); e23166
2. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, Robbins SL: Robbins basic pathology, 2013, Philadelphia (PA), Elsevier/Saunders
3. Bansal A, Goyal S, Goyal A, Jana M, WHO classification of soft tissue tumours 2020: an update and simplified approach for radiologists: Eur J Radiol, 2021; 143; 109937
4. Bendeck TE, Lichtenberg F, Cavernous hemangioma of striated muscle: Review of the literature and report of two cases: Ann Surg, 1957; 146(6); 1011-15
5. Vignesh H, Kumar P, Selvamuthukumaran S, BVS , KGM , Congenital intramuscular cavernous hemangioma: A rare and underreported entity: Cureus, 2025; 17(12); e99673
6. Saldanha E, Martis JJS, Kumar BV, Quiescent volcano – Chest wall hemangioma: Indian J Surg, 2017; 79(4); 354-56
7. De Luca G, La Rocca A, Martucci N, Rocco G, Giant intramuscular cavernous haemangioma of the chest wall: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018; 53(5); 1095
8. Kiran KR, Suresh Babu TV, Babu SS, Deepti K, Skeletal muscle haemangioma: A cause for chronic pain about the knee: A case report: Case Rep Orthop, 2012; 2012; 452651
9. Dantis K, Kashyap Y, Raju A, Bhardwaj S, Intercostal muscle cavernous haemangioma: A chest wall pandora’s box: Eur J Case Rep Intern Med, 2021; 8(1); 002248
10. Chin KF, Khair G, Babu PS, Morgan DR, Cavernous hemangioma arising from the gastro-splenic ligament: A case report: World J Gastroenterol, 2009; 15(30); 3831-33
11. Kumar A, Haemangioma: A review of the literature and an unusual case report: Eur Med J, 2017; 2(1); 31-35
12. Patten DK, Wani Z, Kamineni S, Intramuscular cavernous haemangioma of the triceps: Int J Surg Case Rep, 2011; 2(6); 86-89
13. Melman L, Johnson FE, Intramuscular cavernous hemangioma: Am J Surg, 2008; 195(6); 816-17
14. Gupta A, Deceptive mass – Intramuscular hemangioma in the chest wall: A case report: Ann Med Med Sci, 2025; 4; 878-80
Figures
Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging scans: (A) axial short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence; (B) coronal STIR sequence; (C) axial T1-weighted fat-saturated (T1FS) postcontrast image; and (D) sagittal T1FS postcontrast image, showing a lobulated, patchy enhancing lesion (2.4×1.2×2.3 cm) in the right latissimus dorsi muscle abutting the underlying ribs. There was no edema or enhancement of the adjacent muscles or ribs. Three lobulated, patchy enhancing hepatic lesions measuring up to 2.4×2.4×2.0 cm were also identified, suggestive of incidental hepatic hemangiomas. Red arrows denote the lesion of interest.
Figure 2. Ultrasonography images (A, B) showing a lobulated hypoechoic lesion in the right latissimus dorsi muscle abutting the underlying ribs, measuring 2.7×1.1×2.7 cm. Red arrows denote the lesion of interest.
Figure 3. (A) Photomicrograph showing dilated, thin-walled vascular channels between skeletal muscle bundles, with areas of hemorrhage and congestion (hematoxylin and eosin, ×100), as indicated by the black arrow. (B) Photomicrograph demonstrating plump endothelial-lined capillaries between skeletal muscle bundles (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200), as indicated by black arrows. Scale bar represents 500 μm. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






