07 September 2026: Articles
Refractory Stasis Dermatitis Due to Chronic Venous Insufficiency With Psychosocial Worsening in 2 Septuagenarian Patients Treated With Hyaluronic Acid–Succinic Acid Intradermotherapy
Unusual clinical course, Unusual setting of medical care
Qiaofeng Zhao BCDEFG 1, Marjorie P. ZambranoDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953520
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e953520
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stasis dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis secondary to chronic venous insufficiency. Treatment of refractory cases remains challenging. High-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HMWNCHA) combined with succinic acid (SA) possesses anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties. We report 2 septuagenarian patients with refractory stasis dermatitis and psychosocial deterioration treated with intradermal HMWNCHA plus SA.
CASE REPORT: Case 1 involved a 77-year-old man with chronic venous insufficiency and refractory stasis dermatitis associated with severe symptoms, impaired mobility, and psychosocial deterioration. After failure of conventional therapies, he received 2 sessions of intradermal HMWNCHA plus SA administered 1 month apart, resulting in marked and sustained clinical and psychosocial improvement at 6-month follow-up. Case 2 involved a 75-year-old woman with refractory unilateral stasis dermatitis secondary to chronic venous insufficiency. Following the same treatment protocol, substantial improvement was observed after the first session, with near-complete lesion resolution after the second session and sustained remission at 6-month follow-up. No treatment-related adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: In these 2 patients with refractory stasis dermatitis, intradermal HMWNCHA plus SA was associated with marked and sustained clinical improvements and enhanced quality of life. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Keywords: Dermatitis, Hyaluronic Acid, Succinic Acid, Case Reports, Dermatology
Introduction
Stasis dermatitis is an eczematous inflammatory disorder of the lower extremities secondary to chronic venous insufficiency. Characterized by pain, swelling, persistent pruritus, and ulceration [1], the condition imposes a significant physical burden, including sleep disruption, impaired mobility, and reduced capacity for daily activities [2]. Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common vascular disorder characterized by impaired venous return and venous hypertension, most frequently resulting from valvular incompetence, venous obstruction, or calf muscle pump dysfunction [3]. CVI affects approximately 10–35% of adults and may progressively lead to edema, skin trophic changes, stasis dermatitis, and venous ulceration, particularly in older individuals [4]. Stasis dermatitis represents one of the most common cutaneous manifestations of CVI and is characterized by erythema, scaling, pruritus, xerosis, pain, and skin barrier dysfunction resulting from chronic inflammation and microvascular alterations [5]. Diagnosis is based on clinical evaluation and is confirmed by venous duplex ultrasound, the current gold-standard diagnostic modality [6]. Management primarily focuses on addressing the underlying venous disease through compression therapy, leg elevation, exercise, skin care, and pharmacological or interventional procedures when indicated; however, refractory stasis dermatitis remains a significant therapeutic challenge [7]. These effects are compounded by profound psychological distress, leading to a marked decline in quality-of-life and social functioning, and a heightened risk of depression [6].
Geriatric psychodermatology is an emerging interdisciplinary field that explores the complex relationship between dermatological conditions and psychological health in older adults. Age-related skin changes, chronic dermatoses, pruritus, and visible signs of aging may significantly affect self-perception, emotional well-being, social functioning, and quality of life [8]. Conversely, psychiatric and psychosocial factors such as anxiety, depression, stress, cognitive impairment, and social isolation can influence the onset, severity, and progression of dermatological disorders. Given the bidirectional interaction between the skin and the nervous system, often referred to as the skin-brain axis, comprehensive management of patients of advanced age may benefit from an integrated approach that addresses both cutaneous and psychological aspects of health [9].
Despite the high prevalence and considerable clinical impact of stasis dermatitis, there are currently no specifically approved or consistently effective therapies for managing this condition [10]. The combination of high–molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HMWNCHA) and succinic acid (SA) has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory, pro-regenerative, and bacteriostatic effects [11]. This combination, also referred to as redermalization, is a minimally invasive injectable treatment involving the administration of bioactive compounds into both the dermis and superficial subcutaneous tissue. Originally developed for skin rejuvenation and the management of age-related dermal changes, this approach has demonstrated biostimulatory, regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties [12]. HMWNCHA contributes to tissue hydration, extracellular matrix homeostasis, and wound repair, whereas SA supports cellular metabolism and mitochondrial function [13]. Recent evidence suggests that the combination may promote dermal regeneration, improve skin quality, and modulate inflammatory responses [14], expanding its potential applications beyond aesthetic medicine to inflammatory and chronic dermatological conditions.
The aim of this report is to describe the clinical outcomes in 2 septuagenarian patients with refractory stasis dermatitis and psychosocial deterioration treated with intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA, and to explore the potential therapeutic role of this approach in improving cutaneous and patient-reported outcomes.
Case Reports
CASE 1:
A 77-year-old White man presented with a 1-year history of progressive severe pruritus, pain, and impaired mobility due to stasis dermatitis. The patient did not present hypertension, obesity, or associated metabolic pathologies.
Physical examination revealed erythematous-violaceous patches with marked xerosis and fissuring on both lower legs, with no fever or systemic signs of infection. CVI had been previously diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound and managed conservatively; Daflon 500 mg 2 times per day (Escin, micronized purified flavonoid fraction), compression stockings (20–30 mm Hg), leg elevation, and exercise, with no surgical intervention indicated.
Laboratory evaluation showed elevated C-reactive protein levels (0.52 mg/dL) without other abnormalities. After failure of topical clobetasol (0.05%, night use) followed by tacrolimus (0.1%, night use) combined with oral levocetirizine (5 mg every night), the patient developed significant psychological deterioration, including depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation, and was referred to psychiatry. He subsequently underwent intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA (Xela Rederm 1.8% 2 mL, class III injectable medical device delivering 18 mg/mL of HMWNCHA and 16 mg/mL SA, CE #0373 and Instituto de Salud Pública (Chile) approved, Institute Hyalual Ltd., Switzerland, produced by Diaco Biopharmaceutical, Italy), administered in 2 sessions 1 month apart. Marked improvement in skin quality (Figure 1), neurosensitive symptoms (Figure 2), mobility, and mood was observed after the first session, with sustained remission at 6-month follow-up on emollient therapy alone.
CASE 2:
A 75-year-old White woman with hypertension and dyslipidemia, treated with losartan (50 mg twice daily) and atorvastatin (20 mg daily), presented with an erythematous macular lesion on the left ankle associated with severe pruritus, mild pain, and swelling. Doppler ultrasound confirmed unilateral CVI affecting the involved limb, which was managed conservatively; surgical or sclerotherapy options were not indicated. The specialist prescribed Daflon 500 mg 2 times per day (Escin, micronized purified flavonoid fraction), compression stockings (20–30 mm Hg), leg elevation, and exercise.
After failure of topical clobetasol followed by tacrolimus combined with oral levocetirizine, the patient started presenting mobility problems, associated with persistent pruritus, sleep disturbance, and skin fissuring with occasional bleeding, aggravated by friction from socks and footwear. She was treated using the same intradermal microinjection protocol of HMWNCHA combined with SA as in Case 1. Significant improvement in skin quality, pruritus, hydration, pain, erythema, and mobility was observed after the first session, with marked reduction in lesion size and near-complete skin regeneration after the second session (Figures 2, 3). At her 6-month follow-up, the patient remained in remission on emollient therapy alone, with no recurrence.
Both cases reported in this manuscript followed the treatment plan and evaluation summarized in Figure 4.
Discussion
These 2 cases suggest that intradermal administration of HMWNCHA plus SA may be associated with improvements in patients of advanced age with refractory stasis dermatitis. The observations also highlight the potential importance of addressing both cutaneous and quality-of-life outcomes in the management of this challenging condition.
Stasis dermatitis is characterized by troublesome symptoms that substantially impair patients’ quality of life. Emerging treatments, including pulsed light therapy, diode laser therapy, and platelet-rich plasma, have been proposed; however, these approaches are costly, supported by limited evidence, and predominantly studied in younger patient populations for whom sclerotherapy or surgery is feasible [15,16]. Published reports evaluating novel therapeutic approaches for stasis dermatitis remain scarce. Godoy et al described clinical improvement in a small case series treated with aminaphtone [17], while Nagai et al reported successful management of refractory stasis dermatitis using omega-3-acid ethyl esters [18]. However, in both cases, vascular surgeons declined surgical or sclerotherapy interventions due to patient age and healthcare coverage limitations. Moreover, patients of advanced age often exhibit a poorer therapeutic response and a more refractory or recurrent disease course, likely reflecting age-related alterations in skin barrier function, immune regulation, and sensory neural processing. Our previous study demonstrated that aging impairs both functional responsiveness and molecular signaling in sensory neurons, resulting in altered itch processing [19].
The diagnostic criteria for stasis dermatitis generally include involvement of the lower legs, underlying venous insufficiency, chronicity, bilateral symmetry, and cutaneous pigmentation changes. In the patient in Case 2, symmetry and pigmentation were absent; however, given the presence of venous insufficiency and characteristic ankle involvement, the condition was considered to represent an early-stage presentation of stasis dermatitis. In both patients, persistent pruritus was associated with sleep disturbance, impaired mobility, and psychological distress, highlighting the substantial psychosocial burden of refractory disease and the potential for a self-perpetuating itch-stress cycle. Notably, anhedonia has been recognized as an important component of psychological distress in patients with chronic itch and may further contribute to impaired quality of life.
Furthermore, psychological stress can exacerbate chronic inflammation through neuroendocrine pathways, contributing to disease persistence and impaired skin barrier function, and delayed healing [20,21]. This is particularly relevant in patients of advanced age, in whom psychosocial vulnerability and reduced resilience may amplify disease burden and negatively impact treatment outcomes.
The therapeutic effects observed in our cases may be explained by the complementary and potentially synergistic actions of HMWNCHA and SA. HMWNCHA exerts anti-inflammatory effects by downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokine production and promoting macrophage polarization toward an M2 reparative phenotype, while simultaneously supporting tissue regeneration through enhanced keratinocyte and fibroblast function, improved extracellular matrix organization, and restoration of skin hydration and barrier integrity [22,23]. SA contributes additional immunomodulatory effects, partly through activation of the succinate receptor SUCNR1, resulting in reduced expression of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and IL-6 and further support of M2 macrophage polarization. SA has also been shown to enhance epithelial barrier function and tissue repair [24]. Although SA can exert pro-inflammatory effects under certain metabolic conditions, its controlled intradermal delivery in combination with HMWNCHA may favor a reparative microenvironment. Importantly, intradermal administration may allow targeted delivery to the dermal compartment, optimizing local bioavailability while minimizing systemic exposure, which could be particularly advantageous in patients of advanced age with multiple comorbidities [25]. In stasis dermatitis, a condition characterized by chronic inflammation, tissue hypoxia, impaired healing, and pruritus that leads to scratching that can result in secondary skin changes such as lichenification [26], HMWNCHA plus SA may contribute to symptom relief and restoration of skin integrity.
Conclusions
In these 2 septuagenarian patients with refractory stasis dermatitis, intradermal HMWNCHA plus SA was associated with marked clinical and psychosocial improvement. Although limited by the small number of cases, these findings support further investigation of this approach as a potential therapeutic option for refractory stasis dermatitis.
Figures
Figure 1. Clinical improvement of bilateral stasis dermatitis following intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA and SA in Case 1. Serial clinical photographs of a 77-year-old male patient with bilateral stasis dermatitis treated with intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA. (A) Baseline presentation showing erythematous-violaceous patches, marked xerosis, and skin fissuring affecting both lower legs. (B) Clinical appearance 1 month after the first treatment session, demonstrating improvement in skin hydration and reduction of erythema. (C) Clinical appearance 1 month after the second treatment session (2 months after treatment initiation), showing further improvement in skin quality and lesion severity. (D) Six-month follow-up after the second treatment session (8 months after treatment initiation), demonstrating sustained clinical remission and restoration of skin integrity. R, right leg; L, left leg; HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 2. Changes in neurosensory symptoms during treatment with HMWNCHA and SA. Patient-reported symptom severity during treatment in Cases 1 and 2. Pain (A), burning sensation (B), pruritus (C), and tingling (D) were evaluated using the NRS, with 0 representing no symptoms and 10 representing the worst imaginable symptoms. Scores were recorded at baseline before treatment initiation, after the first treatment session, and after the second treatment session. Both patients demonstrated progressive improvement in all evaluated neurosensory symptoms throughout treatment. NRS, Numerical Rating Scale; HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 3. Clinical improvement of unilateral stasis dermatitis following intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA and SA in Case 2. Serial clinical photographs of a 75-year-old female patient with unilateral stasis dermatitis of the left ankle treated with intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA. (A) Baseline presentation showing an erythematous lesion associated with xerosis and skin damage. (B) Clinical appearance 1 month after the first treatment session, demonstrating reduction in erythema and improvement in skin hydration. (C) Clinical appearance 1 month after the second treatment session (2 months after treatment initiation), showing marked reduction in lesion size and progressive skin regeneration. (D) Six-month follow-up after the second treatment session (8 months after treatment initiation), demonstrating near-complete resolution of the lesion and maintenance of clinical remission. HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 4. Timeline of clinical evaluation, treatment, and follow-up in the 2 patients with stasis dermatitis. Schematic representation of the clinical management in Cases 1 and 2. Both patients underwent baseline clinical evaluation following failure of conventional therapy, including topical corticosteroids, topical tacrolimus, oral antihistamines, compression therapy, and lifestyle measures. Intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA combined with SA was administered in 2 treatment sessions separated by 1 month. Clinical assessments of skin condition and symptom severity were performed at baseline and after each treatment session. Long-term follow-up was conducted 6 months after the second treatment session, demonstrating sustained clinical remission in both patients while receiving emollient therapy alone. HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid. References
1. Yosipovitch G, Jackson JM, Nedorost ST, Stasis dermatitis: The burden of disease, diagnosis, and treatment: Dermatitis, 2024; 35(4); 337-44
2. Sundaresan S, Migden MR, Silapunt S, Stasis sermatitis: Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management: Am J Clin Dermatol, 2017; 18(3); 383-90
3. Ortega MA, Fraile-Martínez O, García-Montero C, Understanding chronic venous disease: A critical overview of its pathophysiology and medical management: J Clin Med, 2021; 10(15); 3239
4. Mayrovitz HN, Aoki KC, Colon J, Chronic venous insufficiency with emphasis on the geriatric population: Cureus, 2023; 15(6); e40687
5. Kaye AD, Islam RK, Tong VT, Cutaneous dermatologic manifestations of cardiovascular diseases: A narrative review: Cureus, 2024; 16(10); e72336
6. Yosipovitch G, Nedorost ST, Silverberg JI, Stasis dermatitis: An overview of its clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and management: Am J Clin Dermatol, 2023; 24(2); 275-86
7. Janßen S, Schmölders J, Jansen TM, Intermittent pneumatic impulse compression in the treatment of stasis dermatitis – A monocenter randomized controlled trial: J Clin Med, 2025; 14(10); 3321
8. Kiser A, Korkomaz T, Ong B, Geriatric psychodermatology: Current concepts and therapeutic strategies: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 2026; 16(2); 855-73
9. Christensen RE, Jafferany M, Unmet needs in psychodermatology: A narrative review: CNS Drugs, 2024; 38(3); 193-204
10. Silverberg J, Jackson JM, Kirsner RS, Narrative review of the pathogenesis of stasis dermatitis: An inflammatory skin manifestation of venous hypertension: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 2023; 13(4); 935-50
11. Grabska-Zielińska S, Urtnowska-Joppek K, Succinic acid in cosmetics and aesthetic dermatology: Biological roles and applications: Appl Sci, 2026; 16(7); 3538
12. Martinez-Gutierrez A, Cami H, Hyaluronic and succinic acid: New biostimulating combination to counteract dermal and subcutaneous aging: Int J Mol Sci, 2025; 26(15); 7548
13. Yi K-H, Kang H, Song JK, Skin boosters: 2026 Updated: J Cosmet Dermatol, 2026; 25(6); e70875
14. Leguina-Ruzzi A, Navarro A, Zambrano M, Efficacy and effectiveness of high molecular weight non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid plus succinic acid mesotherapy in rosacea as adjunct therapy: J Cosmet Dermatol, 2025; 24(10); e70484
15. Ferreira MB, Galego GDN, Nazário NO, Use of 1,470 nm laser for treatment of superficial venous insufficiency: J Vasc Bras, 2021; 20; e20200244
16. Sarvajnamurthy S, Suryanarayan S, Budamakuntala L, Suresh DH, Autologous platelet rich plasma in chronic venous ulcers: Study of 17 cases: J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2013; 6(2); 97-99
17. de Godoy JM, Treatment of stasis dermatitis using aminaphtone: A case series: J Med Case Rep, 2010; 4; 295
18. Nagai K, Matsumaru K, Hirai I, New therapy using omega-3-Acid ethyl esters for decubitus ulcers and stasis dermatitis: A case report: Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2014; 16(12); e19500
19. Zhao Q, Tominaga M, Toyama S, Decreased responsiveness to chemical itch in old mice: Cells, 2025; 14(12); 889
20. Mochel K, Bronte J, Kasaba M, The impact of psychological stress on wound healing: Implications for neocollagenesis and scar treatment efficacy: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 2025; 18; 1625-37
21. Leguina-Ruzzi A, Ortiz Diban R, Velarde V, The 12-HHT/BLT2/NO axis is associated to the wound healing and skin condition in different glycaemic states: Med Sci (Basel), 2019; 7(4); 65
22. Lee CH, Chiang CF, Kuo FC, High-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid inhibits IL-1β-induced synovial inflammation and macrophage polarization through the GRP78-NF-κB signaling pathway: Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(21); 11917
23. Lee BM, Park SJ, Noh I, Kim CH, The effects of the molecular weights of hyaluronic acid on the immune responses: Biomater Res, 2021; 25(1); 27
24. Papurina T, Barsukov O, Zabuga O, Effects of succinic acid on dermal fibroblasts during cultivation under extremely hypoxic conditions: Biochem Biophys Rep, 2023; 33; 101429
25. Mammucari M, Russo D, Maggiori E, Consensus statement on mesotherapy for clinical and regulatory practice: Rheumatol Int, 2026; 46(2); 39
26. Leguina-Ruzzi A, Raichura KR, Tonks SK, Treatment of non-atopic dermatitis with polarized UV-free polychromatic light: A case report: Clin Pract, 2019; 9(3); 1161
Figures
Figure 1. Clinical improvement of bilateral stasis dermatitis following intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA and SA in Case 1. Serial clinical photographs of a 77-year-old male patient with bilateral stasis dermatitis treated with intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA. (A) Baseline presentation showing erythematous-violaceous patches, marked xerosis, and skin fissuring affecting both lower legs. (B) Clinical appearance 1 month after the first treatment session, demonstrating improvement in skin hydration and reduction of erythema. (C) Clinical appearance 1 month after the second treatment session (2 months after treatment initiation), showing further improvement in skin quality and lesion severity. (D) Six-month follow-up after the second treatment session (8 months after treatment initiation), demonstrating sustained clinical remission and restoration of skin integrity. R, right leg; L, left leg; HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 2. Changes in neurosensory symptoms during treatment with HMWNCHA and SA. Patient-reported symptom severity during treatment in Cases 1 and 2. Pain (A), burning sensation (B), pruritus (C), and tingling (D) were evaluated using the NRS, with 0 representing no symptoms and 10 representing the worst imaginable symptoms. Scores were recorded at baseline before treatment initiation, after the first treatment session, and after the second treatment session. Both patients demonstrated progressive improvement in all evaluated neurosensory symptoms throughout treatment. NRS, Numerical Rating Scale; HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 3. Clinical improvement of unilateral stasis dermatitis following intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA and SA in Case 2. Serial clinical photographs of a 75-year-old female patient with unilateral stasis dermatitis of the left ankle treated with intradermal microinjections of HMWNCHA combined with SA. (A) Baseline presentation showing an erythematous lesion associated with xerosis and skin damage. (B) Clinical appearance 1 month after the first treatment session, demonstrating reduction in erythema and improvement in skin hydration. (C) Clinical appearance 1 month after the second treatment session (2 months after treatment initiation), showing marked reduction in lesion size and progressive skin regeneration. (D) Six-month follow-up after the second treatment session (8 months after treatment initiation), demonstrating near-complete resolution of the lesion and maintenance of clinical remission. HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid.
Figure 4. Timeline of clinical evaluation, treatment, and follow-up in the 2 patients with stasis dermatitis. Schematic representation of the clinical management in Cases 1 and 2. Both patients underwent baseline clinical evaluation following failure of conventional therapy, including topical corticosteroids, topical tacrolimus, oral antihistamines, compression therapy, and lifestyle measures. Intradermotherapy with HMWNCHA combined with SA was administered in 2 treatment sessions separated by 1 month. Clinical assessments of skin condition and symptom severity were performed at baseline and after each treatment session. Long-term follow-up was conducted 6 months after the second treatment session, demonstrating sustained clinical remission in both patients while receiving emollient therapy alone. HMWNCHA, high-molecular-weight non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid; SA, succinic acid. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952921
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953836
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953506
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953059
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
22,773,072
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
179,002
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
122,896
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
67,375
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






